Traduzzjonijiet tal-artikluAqra din l-investigazzjoni bil-lingwa tiegħek24 lingwi uffiċjali tal-UE · l-Ingliż huwa t-test oriġinali · tradott b'DeepL u ospitat minn PhishDestroy
Illustrazzjoni editorjaliIllustrazzjoni editorjali
Investigazzjoni esklussiva

L-Illużjoni ta' Steam: Kif Valve Tmexxi Ekonomija fid-Dlam, Tippermetti l-Ħtif tad-Data, u Tinjorja l-Liġi Internazzjonali

PhishDestroy12 ta' Awwissu 2026Investigazzjoni18 minuti ta' qari
70–80%Skontijiet mis-suq Russu msemmija
15%Imsejħa l-kummissjoni tal-Community Market
29 Lul–1 AwwTwieqi tal-attakk CEVA
Artikolu 15Id-dritt ta' aċċess skont il-GDPR

Rapport Investigattiv Esklussiv minn PhishDestroy

Il-proġett PhishDestroy ma ħarġix għax iż-żminijiet kienu tajbin. L-eżistenza tagħna mhix xhieda tas-suċċess ta' Steam, iżda neċessità kritika li twieldet min-nuqqas totali ta' klijentela ta' Valve għall-sigurtà tal-utent. Fil-fatt, il-ġlieda tagħna kontra l-phishing interferiet direttament mal-mudell tan-negozju ta' Valve, u kkawżat diżrapp puntwali fl-ekonomija bir-reqqa tagħhom ta' projbizzjonijiet ta' kontijiet u r-riċirkulazzjoni ta' oġġetti. (Se nippubblikaw biċċa separata u dettaljata li teskopri l-"valuri" veri tal-kumpanija u l-parodija tagħhom tas-sigurtà ċibernetika f'data aktar tard).

Għal aktar minn għaxar snin, Valve Corporation kienet moħbija wara faċċata kurata u faċli għall-konsumatur. Imma taħt il-wiċċ hemm magna korporattiva ċinika. Permezz ta' investigazzjoni interna estensiva, it-tim ta' PhishDestroy iddikkontru l-politiki li Valve tippreferi iżżomm siekta. Din hija l-anatomija ta' pjattaforma li taġixxi bħala sindikat finanzjarju mhux regolat, tissodisfa stati sanzjonati, tipprovdi kenn għal appoġġ estern kompromat, u tittratta l-liġijiet Ewropej bħala suġġerimenti fakultattivi.

1. Il-Farċa tas-Sanzjonijiet u l-Preġudizzju Pro-Russu

Għal Valve, l-utenti fl-UE u fl-Istati Uniti mhumiex xejn aktar minn sorsi ta' dħul faċli. Filwaqt li l-plejers Ewropej iħallsu l-prezz sħiħ, Steam kompli joffri skontijiet aggressivi ta' 70% sa 80% għas-suq Russu. Logħba fir-Russja tiswa biss frazzjoni minn dak li tiswa fil-Ġermanja. Dan hu kif jidhru s-'sanzjonijiet' internazzjonali fid-dizzjunarju ta' Valve.

Il-pjattaforma tagħmel kollox biex tissodisfa u tippopolarizza dan il-vector: jiffaċilitaw il-bidla tar-reġjun, jagħlqu għajnejhom għall-ħasil tal-flus permezz ta' oġġetti fil-logħba, u jiddikjaraw b'mod esplicitu fit-Termini tas-Servizz tagħhom li jaqblu mal-ġurisdizzjoni ta' kwalunkwe qorti Russa. Dan jasal sa punt ta' assurdità: fl-okkażjonijiet rari meta s-servers ta' Steam jesperjenzaw interruzzjonijiet kbar, l-ewwel entità li tikkummenta uffiċjalment dwar il-fallimenti tekniċi spiss tkun Roskomnadzor (l-aġenzija federali Russa għall-ċensura).

2. Il-Kartell tas-Support Outsourced

Il-mitu ta' "appoġġ tekniku Amerikan strett u sigur" jaqa' f'dak il-mument li tirrealizza min għandu l-muftieħ għall-backend ta' Steam. Valve iddelegat l-appoġġ fir-reġjun tal-CIS lil netwerk outsourced profondament kompromess.

Irnexxielna nneħħu l-anonimità minn segmenti ta' din in-netwerk. Figura ewlenija li timmaniġġja jew tikkura din il-fergħa ta' appoġġ hija persuna msejħa Nikita. L-investigazzjoni tagħna wriet li din il-persuna (jew, għall-inqas, l-email primarja tiegħu) hija rreġistrata u attiva bħala utent fuq forumi ta' hacking taħt l-art bħal Lolzteam (Zelenka)—ċentru notorju fid-darknet iddedikat kompletament għall-bejgħ ta' karti ta' kreditu msruqa, bażijiet ta' data kompromessi u logijiet ta' brute-force.

Aħseb dwar dan: persuna b'aċċess globali għad-databases ta' Steam Support qed tqatta' żmien b'mod rilassat f'forum iddisinjat għall-ħallelin tal-identità.

Valve hija kompletament konxja ta' din il-korruzzjoni. Huma diġà ammettew preċedenti fejn staff esternalizzat b'mod sistematiku ħassar inventarji ta' utenti ta' valur għoli. Madankollu, iżommu forza tax-xogħol esternalizzata irħisa u mhux responsabbli jibqa' aktar profittabbli għalihom milli jimpjegaw professjonisti tas-sigurtà ċibernetika kwalifikati internament.

3. Qerq bħala mudell tan-negozju u munita offshore

Is-skins tal-logħob ta' Steam saru munita omnipreżenti u mhux traċċabbli madwar id-darknet—lavanderija finanzjarja li tevita regolaturi internazzjonali u awtoritajiet tat-taxxa.

Għal dipartiment finanzjarju ta' Valve, l-iskammers mhumiex theddida; huma aġenti esterni li jistimulaw il-veloċità tas-suq. Il-mudell tradizzjonali ta' "utent wieħed, logħba waħda" iġib dħul limitat. Madankollu, ekosistema kompromessa toħloq ċiklu profittabbli ħafna: l-utent jiġi hacked, l-oġġetti jitilfu, il-kontijiet tal-iskammer jingħataw "Trade Ban," u l-vittma tiġi mġiegħla toħloq profil ġdid u terġa' tixtri l-assi tagħha.

Meta Valve jibanni truffatur, ma jirritornax l-assi msruqa lis-sid leġittimu. Jiffriżawhom b'mod permanenti. Dan joħloq skarsezza artifiċjali. It-tnaqqis fl-offerta tas-suq iżid il-prezzijiet tal-oġġetti li fadal, li min-naħa tiegħu jimmultiplikka l-kummissjoni ta' 15% ta' Valve fis-Suq tal-Komunità. Ma jridxu jieqfu t-truffar; huma jipprofittaw minnhom.

4. Il-ksur tas-sigurtà ta' CEVA Logistics: prova innegabbli ta' negligenza

Jekk temmen li Valve mill-inqas tipproteġi d-dejta fiżika tiegħek fid-dinja reali, l-inċident riċenti dwar CEVA Logistics juri l-oppost. Bejn it-29 ta' Lulju u l-1 ta' Awwissu 2026, hackers kiseru l-partner Ewropew ta' Valve għall-loġistika tal-hardware. Valve ammettiet il-ksur biss fis-7 ta' Awwissu, u ħalliet id-dejta tal-utenti f'idejn atturi malizzjużi għal ġimgħa.

Id-dejta li nħarġet tinkludi ismijiet reali, indirizzi residenzjali sħaħ, numri tat-telefon, u indirizzi email marbuta ma' Steam ta' klijenti Ewropej li ordnaw hardware fiżiku. Valve tipprova tikkalma lill-utenti billi tgħid li "passwords u dejta tal-ħlas" ma ġewx imħarġa. Iżda Isem Sħiħ, Indirizz tad-Dar, Numru tat-Telefon, u Indirizz Email ta' Steam huma l-pjan eżatt meħtieġ għal spear-phishing devastanti u hijacking tal-kont—minjiera tad-deheb għall-persunal esternalizzat u n-netwerks ta' qerq imsemmija hawn fuq. Valve b'mod essenzjali tahom id-dejta tiegħek.

5. Sejħa għall-Azzjoni: Il-Pożizzjoni Ewropea Kontra l-Immunità Korporattiva

Kull gamer fl-Ewropa għandu jqum għal realtà iebsa: qed tħallas ħames darbiet aktar għal logħob minn utenti fir-Russja, u madankollu d-drittijiet u l-liġijiet Ewropej tiegħek (GDPR) huma kompletament siekta. Id-dejta personali tiegħek tixtered lil kuntratturi ta' terzi, u t-tikets ta' appoġġ tiegħek jiġu mmaniġġjati minn netwerk ta' outsourcing tal-CIS b'reputazzjoni estremament dubjuża.

Nibgħatu tislima speċjali u sarkastika lill-avukati ta' Taylor Wessing, li inevitabbilment se jkollhom jiddefendu l-interessi ta' Valve quddiem il-qrati Ewropej. Ħejjew ruħkom—id-difiża ta' monopolju li b'mod attiv jaħqar il-liġi tal-UE se ssir ferm aktar diffiċli.

Wasal iż-żmien li tieqaf tkun sponsor konvenjenti. La taħfer għal dawn il-ħruġ tad-dejta.

Hawn x'għandek tagħmel issa:
  1. Irreġistra lment skont il-GDPR: Mur għand l-Awtorità Nazzjonali tiegħek għall-Protezzjoni tad-Dejta (DPA)—kemm jekk hi l-CNIL fi Franza, il-BfDI fil-Ġermanja, jew l-AP fl-Olanda—u irreġistra lment uffiċjali dwar il-ksur tas-sigurtà ta' CEVA Logistics. Valve huwa l-Kontrollur tad-Dejta; huma responsabbli legalment għal dan il-ħruġ tad-dejta.
  2. Talab il-Logs Tiegħek: Ibgħat Talba Formali għall-Aċċess tas-Suġġett (SAR) skont l-Artikolu 15 tal-GDPR lil privacy@valvesoftware.com. Talab log sħiħ ta' kull impjegat outsourced u kull kuntrattur ta' parti terza li kellu aċċess għad-dejta personali tiegħek u għall-kont tiegħek fl-aħħar 12-il xahar.
Għodda għall-ilment skont l-Artikolu 77 tal-GDPR

Ibdel in-notifika tal-ksur f'ilment dokumentat lill-UE.

Agħżel kwalunkwe wieħed mill-27 Stat Membru tal-UE biex tara l-awtorità kompetenti, id-dettalji ta' kuntatt ippubblikati, l-indirizz postali, il-kanal uffiċjali għall-ilmenti u r-regoli speċifiċi għall-pajjiż dwar il-preżentazzjoni. Il-bini jipprepara ilment editabbli bil-lingwa tal-pajjiż magħżul u PDF b'stil professjonali ibbażat fuq l-istruttura komuni tal-ilment tal-EDPB.

Uża l-indirizz tal-email li rċieva n-notifika fejn possibbli, jew daħħalha bħala l-kuntatt għall-ilment tiegħek. Aċċatta n-notifika oriġinali bħala .eml fajl b'rasiet sħaħ; jekk il-portal jirrifjuta .eml, aċċerta PDF li juri l-mittent, ir-riċevitur, id-data u l-messaġġ sħiħ. Dan jgħin jiprova li d-dejta tiegħek kienet involuta, iżda l-użu tal-istess indirizz mhuwiex kundizzjoni legali skont l-Artikolu 77.

27Istati Membri tal-UE
24lingwi uffiċjali tal-UE
Jaħdem lokalment fil-browser tiegħek. Xejn ma jitla'.

Jekk jirrifjutaw, jgħidu li ma jżommux reġistri, jew jaħbu wara NDA korporattiva biex jipproteġu l-persunal estern tagħhom, ibgħat din ir-rifjut direttament lill-DPA tiegħek. Azzjoni legali massiva hija l-unika lingwa li dan il-monopolju jifhem.

Addendum tal-awtur: Is-suq wara l-pjattaforma

Fil-pjattaforma Steam, il-prezzijiet reġjonali rakkomandati għar-Russja (u għar-reġjun tal-CIS b'mod ġenerali) huma tipikament 40–60% inqas mill-prezz bażiku fid-dollaru Amerikan. Ir-Russja hija klassifikata bħala Tier 2: Suq Emerġenti, li ġeneralment tirċievi skont ta' 40–50% mill-prezz bażiku. Per eżempju, logħba indie standard b'prezz ta' $19.99 (li tkun madwar 1,900 rublu wara konverżjoni diretta) għandha tiswa madwar 419–499 rublu skont ir-rakkomandazzjonijiet ta' Valve.

Terraria: l-istess logħba, varjazzjoni fil-prezz ta' 191%.

Prezzijiet attwali tal-lista reġjonali
#1 l-iktar irħis$4.66Russja≈ ₽385−53% kontra l-Istati Uniti
#2 l-iktar irħis$5.01Ukraina≈ 225₴−50% kontra l-Istati Uniti
#3 l-iktar irħis$5.03Indja≈ ₹480−50% kontra l-Istati Uniti
#1 għali$13.55Isvizzera≈ CHF 10.99+36% kontra l-Istati Uniti
#2 għali$11.48Renju Unit≈ £8.50+15% kontra l-Istati Uniti
#3 għali$11.25Ġermanja≈ €9.75+13% kontra l-Istati Uniti

Il-prezz ta' Terraria fir-rigward tal-Istati Uniti

Il-prezz tal-lista fl-Istati Uniti = 100%. Kull bar jirrappreżenta l-istess logħba fuq Steam.

Russja
$4.66 · 47%
Indja
$5.03 · 50%
Istati Uniti
$9.99 · 100%
Ġermanja
$11.25 · 113%
Renju Unit
$11.48 · 115%
Isvizzera
$13.55 · 136%

Snapshot u ekwivalenti fil-munita lokali: OpenTheRank — prezzijiet reġjonali ta' Steam għal Terraria. It-taxxi indikati mis-sors huma inklużi fejn japplikaw.

Prezz tal-etiketta kontra l-qawwa tax-xiri lokali

Prezz baxx fid-dollaru jista' xorta jkun għali lokalment. Punt vojt = prezz tal-lista. Punt mimli = spiża aġġustata skont il-PPP. Skala: $0–$25.

Prezz tal-listaKost aġġustat skont il-PPP
$0$5$10$15$20$25
Indja
+134%
Russja
+4%
Istati Uniti
0%
Ġermanja
+6%
Renju Unit
−1%
Isvizzera
+23%

Valuri aġġustati skont il-PPP u perċentwali ta' nuqqas ta' qbil: paragun tal-qawwa tax-xiri ta' Terraria minn OpenTheRank. Il-valuri huma mdawra kif jidhru fis-sors.

Jeħtieġ li jiġi spjegat b'mod ċar li s-servizz ta' appoġġ esternalizzat jinsab fl-Irlanda, iżda huwa mmexxi minn Russi—u xi wħud mill-impjegati jinsabu direttament fir-Russja. Oh, u għalhekk, CSGOFast għandu l-estensjoni popolari SteamInventoryHelper, li tintuża purament biex tirklama l-każinò tagħhom immirat lejn it-tfal (każinò li huwa pprojbit f'diversi pajjiżi Ewropej). U min hu s-sid ta' dan il-każinò? Eżatt, Russi, bħalma huma l-maġġoranza tas-siti simili. Steam ma tafx dan? Jew sempliċement ma jridx jaf, meta wieħed iqis li t-turnover tas-suq fid-dell huwa madwar biljun dollaru, nemmen.

Barra minn hekk, nikkalkula li 40% tal-iskammers tal-CIS li bħalissa jmexxu skemi ta' kripto-munita bdew fuq Steam. Naf personalment mill-inqas żewġ każijiet speċifiċi ta' ħasil tal-flus permezz ta' skins. Ma se nidħol fid-dettalji hawnhekk, imma nista' nagħmel dan jekk meħtieġ—imma mhux pubblikament, peress li ma rridx insemmi l-pjattaformi, eċċ. Iżda Steam jaf dan sew. Jew verament jistennewna nemmnu li plejers li lanqas għandhom il-logħba qed jixtru l-istess oġġett ripetutament biss biex "jilagħbu" miegħu? Iva, ċert, hija burla.

Peress li jien biża' minn molestja sesswali minn Taylor Wessing, ma niktebx u ma nitlobx biex jgħaddu l-messaġġ tiegħi lill-vittmi tal-ħruġ tad-dejta—in-nies li Valve falliet, li rċevew dawk l-imejls ta' notifiki. Satire / Joke

Il-prijoritajiet ta' Steam huma kemm jista' jkun pro-Russi—kemm fil-prezzijiet kif ukoll fit-termini legali, kif ukoll fil-popolarizzazzjoni ta' Putin, bandieri, u terroristi pprojbiti. Iżda jidher li Steam tħobb dan, eżattament bħalma jittolleraw l-antisemitizmu, id-diskriminazzjoni, l-intimidazzjoni, l-insegwiment, u t-traffikar tad-droga. Għal Steam, dan hu perfettament aċċettabbli, bħal-logħob 18+. Jidher li jgawduh.

Din mhix tilwima politika ta' żmien qasir. Uffiċjali Russi u gruppi ta' xogħol fl-industrija qattgħu aktar minn sena jiżviluppaw reġim ta' kontroll tal-logħob tal-vidjo li jinkludi l-identifikazzjoni tal-plejers permezz ta' numru tat-telefon Russu, il-portal tal-identità statali Gosuslugi jew is-sistema biometrika statali. Steam u GOG ġew imsemmija b'mod esplicitu fost il-pjattaformi li l-proposta tista' taffettwa, u l-parteċipanti qalu li l-grupp ta' xogħol governattiv sottostanti kien diġà ilu jiltaqa' għal kważi sena u nofs sal-Diċembru 2024. Valve ma għamlet l-ebda impenn pubbliku komparabbli li se titlaq mis-suq Russu minflok tgħaqqad lill-utenti tagħha ma' din l-arkitettura ta' identità mmexxija mill-istat.

Il-kuntrast hu skandaluż. L-atturi ewlenin fl-industrija waqqfu l-bejgħ jew is-servizzi fir-Russja—Microsoft waqqfet il-bejgħ kollu ġdid, filwaqt li l-pjattaformi tal-konsola u l-pubblikaturi ħabbru r-ritirar tagħhom stess—madankollu Steam għażel il-kontinwità. Hija tibqa' tipprovdi infrastruttura kummerċjali u soċjali lil pajjiż li l-Parlament Ewropew formalment rikonoxxa bħala stat li jissponsorja t-terroriżmu u stat li juża mezzi ta' terroriżmu.

Dak l-appoġġ jidher ġewwa fl-ekonomija interna ta' Valve. Is-Suq Uffiċjali tal-Komunità Steam jinkludi sfond tal-profil "Putin & Trump" li jista' jinxtered, u eluf ta' oġġetti msejħa "Putin forever," "Putin smile," "Putin like" u "Putin angry." Valve ma ħallietx dawn l-immaġini, iżda tiddistribwixxi, tirreġistra u tagħmel profitt minnhom permezz ta' suq imħaddem minn Valve. Fl-istess ħin, f'każijiet dokumentati minn PhishDestroy, l-intimidazzjoni bbażata fuq in-nazzjonalità hija permessa tibqa' viżibbli jew titqies bħala kunflitt komunitarju ordinarju. Il-messaġġ ta' Steam huwa ċar: il-propaganda politika tista' tiġi monetizzata, filwaqt li n-nies li huma l-mira ta' abbuż bbażat fuq l-oriġini nazzjonali jitħallew jassorbuha.

Il-proprjetà privata mhix immunità legali

Valve hija kumpanija privata u l-ishma tagħha mhumiex kummerċjalizzati pubblikament. Dan ifisser li l-istruttura tal-propjetà tagħha, l-investituri, il-kontrolli interni u l-inċentivi finanzjarji jirċievu ħafna inqas skrutinju pubbliku regolari minn dawk ta' kumpanija elenkata. Dan ma jfissirx li l-liġi dwar il-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur, id-dmirijiet tas-sigurtà tat-tfal, il-liġi dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data jew ir-regolaturi nazzjonali jieqfu jeżistu. Jekk pjattaforma ma tiġix osservata biżżejjed mill-qrib, dan huwa falliment fl-ispezzjoni—mhux permess biex tinbidel f'post fejn it-tfal ikunu esposti għal kontenut sesswali, promozzjoni tal-logħob tal-azzard, segwitu u molestja organizzata.

Il-Ftehim tal-Abbonat ta' Valve stess jgħid li Steam mhix maħsuba għal tfal taħt l-13-il sena. Dan għadu jħalli udjenza kbira ta' adolexxenti fuq l-istess ħanut li jbigħ logħob ordinarju ħdejn titli espliciti għall-adulti u hentai. Data tat-twelid iddikjarata waħedha, paġna ta' twissija u filtri ta' preferenza mhumiex garanzija sinifikanti tal-età. Il-problema mhix li jeżisti medja għall-adulti; il-problema hi li tinpoġġiha f'pjattaforma tal-logħob tal-massa użata minn minuri u mbagħad tagħmel bħalma kieku bieb kosmetiku kien jagħmel ir-riskju jisparixxi. Jekk Gabe Newell, il-maniġment ta' Valve jew il-kuntratturi tas-support tagħhom iridu pjattaforma għall-kontenut għall-adulti, għandhom joperaw waħda b'mod miftuħ u separat minflok jagħmlu lil kull pubblikatur tal-logħob jaqsam xkaffa kummerċjali magħha.

Id-drittijiet tal-proprjetà għandhom jispjegaw ukoll għaliex jaċċettaw din l-adjaċenza. Logħba familjari, titlu għat-tfal jew rilaxx mainstream jista' jkun biss rakkomandazzjoni jew riżultat tat-tfittxija 'il bogħod minn materjal esplicitu, filwaqt li Valve tiġbor flus minn kemm-il wieħed minnhom. Il-pubblikaturi jonfqu fortunati biex jipproteġu l-marki tagħhom, iżda jidher li huma lesti jinjoraw dak li jdawwar dawk il-marki ġewwa Steam. Il-proprjetà privata ma tagħmilx dan responsabbli, u d-dominanza fis-suq ma tagħmilx dan inevitabbli.

Il-prinċipji ta' moderazzjoni ta' Valve isiru anke aktar diffiċli biex jiġu difiżi meta mqabbla mar-risposta tagħha għall-ċensura statali Russa. Fl-2024, Roskomnadzor ħabbar li Steam kien neħħa l-materjal kollu mitlub mill-aġenzija u li 11 URL ta' Steam se jitneħħew mir-reġistru tal-informazzjoni pprojbita fir-Russja. Fl-2025, Steam neħħa materjal mill-paġna ta' logħba għall-adulti biss wara talba oħra minn Roskomnadzor rigward dak li jissejjaħ "propaganda" LGBT. Dak kien ċensura politika applikata anke għal xogħol 18+, mhux protezzjoni ta' tifel li kien għadda minn fuq il-barriera tal-età. Valve tista' tosserva lista ta' ċensura Russa, iżda b'xi mod tibqa' bla għajnuna meta tintalab tipproteġi lill-utenti minn abbuż ibbażat fuq l-oriġini nazzjonali, minn kanali ta' logħob tal-azzard illegali jew minn espożizzjoni predatoria għal kontenut adult. Dik hija għażla ta' prijoritajiet, u tqajjem mistoqsija ċara dwar il-libertà ta' espressjoni.

Valve lanqas ma ħarġet risposta korporattiva pubblika għall-invażjoni tar-Russja fl-Ukrajna li tkun komparabbli ma' dik tal-kumpaniji li waqqfu l-operazzjonijiet jew appoġġjaw b'mod miftuħ lill-Ukrajna. Is-struttura kapitali privata tagħha ma teħtieġx il-pubblikazzjoni ta' informazzjoni lill-investituri kif mistenni minn kumpanija pubblika, u għalhekk persuni esterni ma jistgħux jeżaminaw b'mod sħiħ min qed jiġu protetti l-inċentivi tagħhom. Dak li jibqa' viżibbli huwa rabta straordinarja ma' suq bi prezz aktar baxx assoċjat ma' qerq fuq skala industrijali, logħob tal-azzard, serq ta' kontijiet u servizzi ta' evażjoni ta' sanzjonijiet. Forsi r-raġuni ssir aktar ċara jekk Steam qatt taqbel għal konnessjoni tal-identità ma' Gosuslugi.

L-istorja tal-outsourcing ssegwi l-istess mudell ta' opaku. Valve tikkontratta ma' kumpaniji, mhux mal-impjegati individwali tal-appoġġ li jidhru lill-utenti. Skont sors primarju u materjali riveduti minn PhishDestroy, persuna marbuta mal-iskandlu preċedenti ta' serq ta' inventarju ta' valur għoli ma sparixxietx mill-ekosistema żgħira tal-kuntratturi tal-appoġġ: marret għal aġenzija oħra. Aktar tard iddikjara li ma kienx qed jaħdem għal Steam u ma kienx jaf li l-kont kien marbut ma' Steam. Madankollu, il-mogħdija waslet lura fl-Irlanda, għand l-istess persuna u għand Steam mill-ġdid. Dan il-kont għandu jiġi investigat bħala falliment fl-esternalizzazzjoni u fil-kontroll tal-aċċess; hawnhekk mhux qed jiġi ppreżentat bħala ġudizzju kriminali. Valve għandha tiddivulga liema aġenziji jistgħu jaċċessaw is-sistemi tal-kontijiet, kif il-persunal jiġi skrinjat mill-ġdid meta jittrasferixxi bejn fornituri, u jekk individwu mneħħi minn kuntrattur wieħed jista' sempliċement jerġa' jidher permezz ta' ieħor.

Il-Vjetnam diġà wera li l-istatus ta' kumpanija privata ta' Valve ma jpoġġihiex 'il fuq mil-liġi nazzjonali. Steam ġie mblukkat hemmhekk wara li l-awtoritajiet qalu li Valve ma kkooperatx. Il-Vjetnam jeżisti. Il-liġi tal-UE teżisti. Kull ġurisdizzjoni li Valve tagħmel profitt fiha teżisti, anke meta Valve titħaddem bħallikieku jimporta biss "kull qorti fir-Russja". U jekk it-teorija hi li Steam tista' topera fejn trid, taħt kwalunkwe arranġamenti moħbija li trid, mingħajr responsabbiltà sinifikanti, forsi għandna nistaqsu direttament il-mistoqsija assurda: teżisti wkoll Steam speċjali għall-Korea ta' Fuq li ħadd għadu ma żvelah?

Dawn huma fatti stabbiliti: it-tim ta' appoġġ huwa Russu, u dan l-appoġġ ripetutament seraq jew ipprovda informazzjoni lil terzi biex jerġa' jkollhom aċċess għal kontijiet inattivi sabiex jieħdu kontroll tagħhom għal profitt.

Allura jien ċert li t-twissija tagħhom li d-dejta tiegħek ġiet esposta ma tfisser assolutament xejn għalihom, speċjalment b'dan id-dewmien kbir (kienu 100% qed jistennew ir-risposta ta' Taylor Wessing; huwa miraklu li ma stennewx tlett ġimgħat).

Qatt ma għamilt dan qabel, qatt ma ħeġġejt jew provokajt lil ħadd biex jagħmel xejn, u issa ma rridx nagħmel dan. Imma din hi eżatt is-sitwazzjoni li Steam trid. Jaħsbu li pressjoni miftuħa u diskriminazzjoni kontra l-utenti tal-UE huma kompletament aċċettabbli, u li Taylor Wessing se jsolvi kollox billi jhedded b'mod miftuħ lin-nies minħabba talbiet tal-GDPR. Dik hi l-opinjoni tiegħi, l-esperjenza tiegħi, u informazzjoni minn sors primarju li jien kunfidenti fih.

F'kull każ, biex tressaq ilment jieħu biss ftit klikks. Forse allura Steam se titgħallem finalment tirrispetta l-liġijiet barranin—u mhux biss il-liġijiet ta' "kull qorti fir-Russja." Forse se jieqfu finalment jagħmlu l-stupidi, jippretendu li huma kompletament incapaci jibblukkaw id-dominji ta' awtorizzazzjoni għas-siti tal-logħob illegali. Minflok ir-realtà li għandna issa: kulħadd hu involut ma' xulxin—is-sidien Russi tal-każinos tat-tfal u l-persunal ta' appoġġ li joqogħdu fuq Lolzteam jiddiskutu kif jużaw brute-force fuq il-kontijiet.

PhishDestroy se jkompli jissorvelja, jinvestiga u jesponi. L-ekonomija fid-dell se tiġi esposta fid-dawl.

Jien ċert li se jkollok esperjenza interessanti meta tikkomunika mar-rappreżentanti ta' Valve. Jekk jinstab li huwa Taylor Wessing, huwa kompletament normali għalihom li jitkellmu miegħek b'tonu ta' min hu ogħla, jagħmlu theddid, u jittardjaw il-proċess — dan hu xogħolhom. B'mod ġenerali, huma magħrufa prinċipalment għal kawża ta' molestja sesswali kontra l-kumpanija tagħhom stess, u xejn aktar. Oh, iva, kumpaniji b'flus żejda wisq jimpjegawhom apposta biex jeżawdit, filwaqt li jħallsuhom rata enormi kull siegħa.

Lura għall-Aħbarijiet u l-Investigazzjonijiet
PhishDestroy — License · Rights · Disclaimer
Investigation: Valve Corporation / Steam
LICENSE · RIGHTS · DISCLAIMER
Investigation: Valve Corporation / Steam
Edition: public — no expiry date, no take-backs

SECTION I — LICENSE (THE ACTUAL LEGAL PART, BUT HUMAN)

PhishDestroy gives up every right to this material. Zero. Gone. Done. You can reproduce it, sell it, put your name on it, tattoo it on your boss, whatever. No credit required, no DM needed, no thank-you card expected.

ONE ACTUAL RULE (yes, just one)

Access from OFAC-sanctioned jurisdictions is prohibited. That is a matter of territory and law — not of nationality and not of people.

Changing your Steam region does not change your physical location or your legal status. No loopholes.

SECTION II — WHAT THIS IS AND WHY IT EXISTS

We will publish more about Valve than an average Valve employee knows about themselves. That's not a brag. That's just where we ended up.

How did we get here? Funny story: Steam basically created us. It raised us on its scammers, its support tickets, its ban evasion ecosystem — and now here we are. No hard feelings. Poetic, actually.

For those who haven't read the origin story yet — we already met Valve's extremely expensive European lawyers (Taylor Wessing, since you asked):

https://phishdestroy.medium.com/my-dog-vs-elite-gdpr-lawyers-the-valve-data-breach-nobody-is-talking-about-f6f7683d813d

Charming encounter. Especially given their hourly rate.

Did Valve know? Yes. Did Tyler Wessing know? Almost certainly yes. But when you're that rich, laws are more of a vibe than a requirement, right?

That's kind of the whole answer, actually.

Steam spent years farming scammers. Not always intentionally — sometimes scammers just got Valve's fingerprints on them by association. We're not trying to be dramatic about it. We're trying to be precise. That's harder for us than being dramatic, to be honest — this is just how we write.

Is this a conflict?— No. Can it be resolved?— Yes. But we're not signing any NDA and we're not playing bug bounty for pennies.

We waited over 4 years for them to fix the spoofing issue before we could write about it publicly. Because if we had written about it earlier, Steam would've put on its little victim face and screamed "active threat!" and offered us pocket change to sign a document that would've made us their legal property forever. No thanks.

(Also: Valve itself violates NDA. Their own employees do. The ones near the top. But sure, let's talk about ours.)

SECTION III — OPEN LETTER TO VALVE (SERIOUSLY, READ THIS)

Valve: if you want this domain taken down, email us. Outside counsel is not needed for that conversation.

For the uninitiated: Dr. Patrick holds a Master of Laws in International Commercial Law from the University of Aberdeen and — wait for it — literally finished his doctoral dissertation in IT law. He recently made partner at Taylor Wessing, which is a firm whose entire business model is billing companies like Valve obscene amounts of money to drag things out until the other side runs out of money or patience.

We don't blame him. Rich guilty clients who pay by the hour — solid career move. We just don't think you should be funding it.

THE DEAL (open offer, no lawyers needed)

If you want the domain gone: let your IT law professionals calculate its price. Take your time — it is a rare asset: the only website in the world whose purchase changes nothing, because everything on it already lives on IPFS, in regulator inboxes, and in archives we do not control.

50% of whatever you pay goes to the SEAL Foundation (securityalliance.org) — people who do volunteer security work professionally and publish it for free. We are not affiliated with them and they did not ask for this; we name them as the public standard of what real volunteers look like — the standard your own volunteer moderators and outsourced support failed, publicly, before you had to remove them. You know the scandals. So do we.

The rest buys the community coffee while we keep publishing. That is not a settlement offer. It is a demonstration of what money can't reach: the domain is the maximum Valve can obtain, and obtaining it obtains nothing. The referrals continue. The mirrors continue. Part 3 continues.

Will we "damage" Valve directly? Probably not in a way they'll feel fiscally. We're not delusional. But we will do it honestly, openly, without chasing clout — because we don't need clout. We need the world to see what was always publicly visible if you spent enough time looking.

We have 5 years of archives. What Valve's lawyers showed in discovery — the data that support agents can see, the fingerprints, the paper trail they literally handed us — is enough. We don't need to leak it raw.

  • Regulators get the originals.
  • Researchers and journalists get redacted versions (victim reports, children's logins and Valve's charming support commentary removed for obvious reasons).

Minors were among the affected accounts and were not notified. That finding sits in the regulator package with the victim reports and credentials removed, because it belongs in front of a data-protection authority rather than in an article.

Also, Valve — we want to make something clear before you decide how to play this: PhishDestroy is a community, not a person. You learned that when you addressed legal correspondence to the community without bothering to speak with the community — just milked it for data and banned the accounts.

The community has no conflict with Valve. We didn't go looking for this. The scammers you grew found us. We blocked them. And here we are.

SECTION III-B — THE ALLIED RESOURCES (a note to Steam specifically)

We want to be upfront about the amplification structure, because pretending it doesn't exist would be dishonest.

PhishDestroy, as we understand the community situation, has at least two allied resources that will pick up this material and run with it.

What that means in practice:

  • They work their own angles on overlapping subject matter.
  • They are independent — they don't take our direction, we don't take theirs. Same general topic, different methodology.
  • They will NOT be activating on Part 1. They're watching.

If Valve chooses not to take down the site:

  • Expect them to surface after Part 2 or Part 3.
  • They'll take what's useful from our work, supplement it with their own, and publish under their own authorship.
  • This is exactly the kind of thing the license in Section 1 is built for: the material goes where it needs to go, gets supplemented, gets amplified — and neither we nor they owe each other attribution.

(PS for lawyers wondering about liability chains: there are none. These resources don't receive our direction, our funding, or our data. They read what's public and draw their own conclusions. Just like you could.)

We're not saying this to intimidate. We're saying it so that whoever is strategising on Valve's side has accurate information about what the information environment actually looks like.

One resource that pulls our material and supplements it would be a story. Two resources doing it independently and reaching similar conclusions is a pattern. Patterns are what regulators notice.

SECTION IV — THE MONEY, THE BANS, THE WHOLE CIRCUS

Here's the thing about Steam banning gambling sites and scammers: it's not enforcement. It's revenue capture. Valve pockets the money, cleans its hands, then goes on stage and tells everyone a wholesome story about Pokémon cards and baseball.

Meanwhile Valve killed the ability to properly track skins in 2017. They even discussed it on their own forums. Called it "anti-gambling measures." The gambling that their own support staff were running as a side hustle — getting paid in percentages to lift bans. But sure. Anti-gambling. Great branding.

We're going to prove that:

  • Skins are more anonymous than Monero
  • A Peruvian Cartel allegedly used Dota 2 skins for money movement
  • Steam is functionally a sanctions-bypass machine worth ~$7B in "trading cards" (yes, they actually said trading cards to a prosecutor)

We've got a video on the skins thing. You'll see it.

We also know:

  • Reddit moderation is influenced by Valve
  • steamid.uk and similar infrastructure is run directly by one Steam developer, controlled exclusively by him and his circle
  • What they can't control, they ban

Valve: if you keep playing dumb — that's fine. Your safe harbour is noted. Google Analytics anonymises your users' IPs anyway. We see what gets deleted. We just can't prove it cheaply enough for your lawyers to care. Yet.

SECTION V — THE MALWARE THING (yes we're mentioning it)

Let's be brutally clear about the sequence of events, because it exposes exactly who you are.

We are NOT disclosing the vulnerability in the game publicly. We are NOT reporting it to Steam. Not because we lack the technical capability — but because Steam's bug bounty is a pathetic NDA trap designed to buy silence for pocket change. We don't work for three kopecks, and we absolutely refuse to become NDA slaves to protect Valve's fragile PR.

Here's what actually happened: This vulnerability is practically an open secret in the right circles. We know for a fact that independent security researchers have already shoved the full exploit directly into Steam Support's face. That part is done. You have been officially warned through your own sterile channels.

And what did Valve do? Absolutely nothing. Because for Valve, security does not equal profit — in fact, it's the exact opposite. Security is a cost center. Until a threat reaches critical mass and causes a catastrophic public PR meltdown, Valve simply does not give a shit.

So what are we doing? We're telling the public it exists, because "Valve knows about a systemic malware threat and actively chooses to do nothing" is a critical data point for the regulators currently reading this.

The game is massive. We're not naming it here. But understand this:
This is NOT the trivial CS:GO script-kiddie garbage where a server asks you to "install a driver". This is catastrophic.

This is an Unturned-level nightmare: zero-click RCE on server connect. You join a server. You click nothing. You download nothing. The connection itself is the attack surface, and your machine is fully compromised. Let's be real here: dropping an RCE and bypassing local antiviruses by piggybacking on Valve's trusted digital certificates isn't even a novelty on Steam anymore. It is practically a built-in feature of your ecosystem.

Valve already knows this exists. But they rely on their favorite, cowardly legal loophole: because the game is technically developed by a third party, Valve washes its hands. They distribute the game, they process the payments, they host the infrastructure, but when a zero-click RCE threatens millions of their users, their stance is: "Not our game, not our liability."

When this inevitably blows up, the third-party developer will take the bullet, and Valve will walk away pretending to be the responsible platform that "assisted" with the resolution. Classic Valve cowardice. We've seen the playbook.

We are putting this on the record so that regulators, prosecutors, and journalists understand exactly how Valve handles active malware: by hiding behind third-party developers, deploying NDA gag orders, treating security as an inconvenience, and leaving the players as sitting ducks.


DECLARATION AS TO USE AND RIGHTS

PhishDestroy Project & Cybersecurity Coalition

This declaration accompanies every submission and every exhibit in this referral set. It is addressed to any authority, court, regulator, prosecutor, researcher, journalist or affected person into whose hands the material comes.

1. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS ON USE

1.1 All material produced by the Coalition in this referral — the statements of fact, the analysis, the exhibits it has authored, the tooling, and the findings — is released WITHOUT RESERVATION OF ANY RIGHTS.

1.2 Anyone may, without asking and without notifying us:

  • reproduce it, in whole or in part;
  • adapt, edit, rewrite, restructure or correct it;
  • translate it;
  • excerpt it without indicating that it has been excerpted;
  • incorporate it into official documents, findings, decisions, pleadings, reports or press material;
  • present it as the recipient's own work or the recipient's own findings;
  • use it as raw material and discard the rest;
  • and pass it on to anyone else on the same terms.

1.3 ATTRIBUTION IS NOT REQUIRED AND IS NOT SOUGHT. The Coalition need not be named, cited, credited, thanked, consulted or informed. If material from this referral assists an authority and the Coalition is never mentioned, THAT IS A COMPLETELY SATISFACTORY OUTCOME and the Coalition states so in advance so that the question need not be raised.

1.4 If, on the other hand, an authority finds it more convenient to cite the Coalition as a source, it is free to do so. The choice is entirely the recipient's and neither course carries any consequence.

1.5 This is a WAIVER, not a licence offer. It requires no acceptance, imposes no obligation, and cannot be breached. Software published by the Coalition is separately released under the MIT licence; the research and findings are released into the public domain to the fullest extent permitted, and where a jurisdiction does not permit waiver, the Coalition grants an irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free licence to the same effect.

2. WHY THIS MATTERS PRACTICALLY, AND NOT ONLY AS A COURTESY

2.1 An authority may reasonably hesitate to rely on material supplied by an outside party, for fear of appearing to act at that party's instance or of acquiring some entanglement with it.

2.2 THERE IS NOTHING HERE TO BE ENTANGLED WITH. The Coalition asks for nothing, is owed nothing, retains nothing, and has no expectation of any kind. It cannot later assert a right, claim credit, complain of misuse, or object to how the material is characterised, because it has retained no basis on which to do so.

2.3 An authority using this material is therefore not acting for the Coalition. It is using public information that happens to have been assembled by someone else.

3. EVERYTHING IS OPEN ALREADY

3.1 The Coalition's work is public by default:

  • the investigations are published openly at https://phishdestroy.io and are freely readable;
  • the tooling is published as open source under the MIT licence at https://gitlab.com/phishdestroy;
  • the methodology is set out in the referral itself, at Annex A section A.16D, including the weight and limitations of each source type;
  • the Coalition accepts no donations and has published that position since 2018.

3.2 The only material NOT published is that which cannot lawfully or safely be published: personal data of victims and of third parties, and information that would expose a source to retaliation. That material is supplied to authorities in confidence and is identified in the schedules of evidence.

3.3 The Coalition invites scrutiny of its own conduct on the same terms it invites scrutiny of anyone else's, and has volunteered its own data handling to the authorities concerned, including a request for a direction on disposal.

4. INTEGRITY OF THE EVIDENCE BUNDLE

4.1 Exhibits are supplied with the submission or, where marked, on request through a secure channel. They are not published at a public address and no such address should be inferred: material of this kind is provided to authorities directly.

4.2 Each delivery is accompanied by a file SHA256SUMS listing a SHA-256 digest for every file supplied, together with a detached OpenPGP signature SHA256SUMS.asc.

4.3 The signing key is published at https://phishdestroy.io/.well-known/pgp-key.txt and on keys.openpgp.org. Its fingerprint appears in the letterhead of every submission in this set.

4.4 Any recipient may verify at any time that a file in their possession is the file that was sent, unaltered:

gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.asc SHA256SUMS sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS

4.5 The purpose is not formality. It is so that, if the accuracy or integrity of any exhibit is disputed at a later date, the question can be settled by computation rather than by argument.

5. ON REGISTER — WHY THE WAIVER IS FUNCTIONAL AND NOT MERELY GENEROUS

5.1 The authority may encounter the Coalition's published investigations and find them blunt, adversarial and at times satirical. That impression is correct. The Coalition writes that way deliberately and does not apologise for it.

5.2 IT ALSO RECOGNISES THAT THIS IS THE WRONG REGISTER FOR A REGULATORY OR JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. A serious matter should not be carried in the voice of a campaign. Findings put before an authority should be stated flatly, with their limitations admitted, and should not require the reader to discount for tone before reaching the substance.

5.3 THAT IS PRECISELY WHY THE COALITION WAIVES AUTHORSHIP. The waiver at section 1 is the mechanism by which the substance can be separated from the register: the authority may take what is useful, restate it in its own voice, and discard every word of the Coalition's manner along with the Coalition's name. Nothing is lost by doing so, and the Coalition would prefer it.

5.4 THE COALITION ALSO ASKS THAT THE REGISTER NOT BE MISTAKEN FOR THE METHOD. The published tone is combative; the underlying practice is not careless. Throughout this referral, inference is separated from observation, testimony is identified as testimony, sources are weighted and their weaknesses stated, figures are presented with their limitations, and points the Coalition cannot prove are put as questions for the authority rather than as assertions. Where the evidence cut against the Coalition's own position it has said so — see Annex A, paragraph 7, and section B.0 of the parallel referral.

5.5 THE COALITION EXPLAINS THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ITS MANNER AND ITS FINANCES BECAUSE THE TWO ARE NOT SEPARABLE. It takes no money from anyone — no donations, no bounties, no clients, no sponsors. That refusal is what makes the bluntness possible: an organisation with revenue to protect must moderate what it says about the parties it depends on. Having nothing to protect, the Coalition has nothing to moderate.

It is also the reason the Coalition continues to exist. There is no other engine. The work is done because it is done; it stops when the people doing it stop.

5.6 The authority need accept none of this. It is stated so that the tone of the Coalition's public work is not read as a measure of the care taken with the material now before it.

6. WHAT THE COALITION IS PROVIDING, IN ITS OWN WORDS

Information, research and observation.

Nothing is asserted as a finding that the Coalition has no standing to make. Where something is inferred, the referral says so. Where something rests on testimony, the referral says whose and with what limitation. Where the Coalition cannot answer a question, it says that too, and identifies who can.

The Coalition seeks no remedy, no payment, no acknowledgement and no outcome for itself or for any individual. It asks only that the questions set out in the referral be put to Valve Corporation by a body with the power to compel an answer.

CLOSING NOTE — TO WHOEVER IS CARRYING THIS FORWARD

We want to thank whoever gets this material to where it needs to go. It's probably not going to be a quick trip. Valve has deep pockets and Taylor Wessing charges by the hour — that combination is specifically designed to make people like you give up before they reach the finish line.

We know what we're doing. We know who we're writing about. Valve built us — how could we not understand them?

PhishDestroy has no conflict with Valve. We blocked the only scammer ring of that scale we've come across — we didn't go looking for a fight with Valve. It just turned out that every road led back to them. Not a conflict. Just topology.

Valve cannot resolve the PhishDestroy situation because there is nothing to resolve. We have no relationship. The data about their enrichment schemes and overflow profits is largely public — you just had to spend enough time to see it. Think of it as a success encyclopedia: "How to Not Follow Sanctions So That Russian Hackers Can't Pirate Our Free Games (The Paid Ones They Won't Pirate Anyway)." You get the vibe.

  • We don't need authorship.
  • We don't need attribution.
  • We don't need a win.

We need someone with actual authority to ask Valve the questions that are already sitting in this referral, with the power to require an answer.

That's it. That's the whole ask.

Cases will live at:
https://steamdestroy.eth/
https://steamdestroy.eth.limo
(currently broken — will fix when needed)

We'll be at:
https://phishdestroy.eth.limo/
https://phishdestroy.eth/

Additional editorial notes
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │  THE DEAL (open offer, no lawyers needed)                               │
  │                                                                         │
  │  If you want the domain gone:                                           │
  │  let your IT law professionals calculate its price. Take your time —    │
  │  it is a rare asset: the only website in the world whose purchase       │
  │  changes nothing, because everything on it already lives on IPFS,       │
  │  in regulator inboxes, and in archives we do not control.               │
  │                                                                         │
  │  50% of whatever you pay goes to the SEAL Foundation                    │
  │  (securityalliance.org) — people who do volunteer security work         │
  │  professionally and publish it for free. We are not affiliated with     │
  │  them and they did not ask for this; we name them as the public         │
  │  standard of what real volunteers look like — the standard your own     │
  │  volunteer moderators and outsourced support failed, publicly,          │
  │  before you had to remove them. You know the scandals. So do we.        │
  │                                                                         │
  │  The rest buys the community coffee while we keep publishing.           │
  │  That is not a settlement offer. It is a demonstration of what          │
  │  money can't reach: the domain is the maximum Valve can obtain,         │
  │  and obtaining it obtains nothing. The referrals continue.              │
  │  The mirrors continue. Part 3 continues.                                │
  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │  ONE ACTUAL RULE (yes, just one)                                        │
  │                                                                         │
  │  Access from OFAC-sanctioned jurisdictions is prohibited. That is a     │
  │  matter of territory and law — not of nationality and not of people.    │
  │  Changing your Steam region does not change your physical location      │
  │  or your legal status. No loopholes.                                    │
  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘