Security engines reporting a detection: 1. Public blocklists reporting a match: 3. Exercise extreme caution — do not enter credentials or personal information.
Analysis of cryptobridge.online indicates the site was registered through NameCheap, Inc. on July 31, 2025 and is hosted on Amazon’s AS16509 network at IP 216.198.79.65, a United States address. The page title “CryptoBridge - Secure Wallet Connection Platform” suggests a cryptocurrency‑related service, and the intelligence tags the campaign as a “Fake Airdrop” impersonating Ethereum. No TLS certificate was observed, meaning the site was served over plain HTTP. VirusTotal recorded a single positive detection out of 95 scanned vendors, confirming at least one security product identified malicious behavior.
The domain is currently offline, and it has been added to four independent blocklists, specifically PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura. Nameservers are dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com, typical of the registrar’s default configuration. The available evidence confirms that the infrastructure is actively leveraged for a brand‑impersonation campaign, but the limited detection count suggests that many scanners have not yet flagged the site, possibly due to its short lifespan or evasion techniques.
No additional artifacts such as malicious payloads, credential‑harvesting forms, or redirect chains have been disclosed, leaving the precise attack vector uncertain. Defenders should update URL filtering policies to block cryptobridge.online and its associated IP address, enforce TLS‑only connections for cryptocurrency services, and monitor for any resurgence of the domain or similar patterns using the same registrar or hosting ASN. Continuous threat‑intel feeds should be consulted for new detections, and any inbound traffic to the listed IP should be inspected for anomalous request patterns consistent with airdrop‑style phishing attempts.
Detection-evasion analysis
Cloaking and traffic-distribution check
Not observedNo cloaking was observed in the stored scan
Stored crawler-versus-browser observations for this host, plus a live fingerprint check for Keitaro-style traffic distribution systems.
Stored cloaking flag
Not observed
Cloaking score
0/6
Last cloaking scan
Scanner note:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cryptobridge.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
Live TDS fingerprint check
Seven Keitaro fingerprints plus a crawler-versus-browser comparison, run from the PhishDestroy scanner when this panel is open.
What we count
Elapsed time from the first stored abuse report to the first observation that the content was unavailable. This does not establish the cause.
What each report contains
Stored outgoing-report records may reference evidence available at the time, such as vendor verdicts, registration data, hosting details, classifications, or screenshots. This page does not infer the exact payload delivered, receipt, acknowledgement, or action by a recipient.
Technical detailsProvenance & timestamps
First DetectedOct 22, 2025
DOM Analysisanalyzed Mar 24, 2026score 15/1004 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://cryptobridge.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
Accreditation and RAA context
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS inactivereason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationUnknownProbe Inconclusive20%2026-10-13 01:09:20 UTC
RDAP registrationUnknown
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-09 04:44:11 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-09 04:44:11 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,187.51hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-05 10:29:33 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
Threat Ingested
cryptobridge.online detected and queued for full analysis
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
The latest stored checks indicate that the reported content is unavailable; this does not establish who or what caused the change.
Feb 23, 2026
Time to First Unavailability
2967 hours elapsed from detection to the first unavailable observation.
How we investigate & report
Public scans, evidence and abuse channels
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
3 evidence signal groups linked0 reports recordedContent unavailable
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.
If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Beware of recovery scammers! Recovery scammers may pose as investigators, lawyers, or tracing services. Do not pay upfront fees or disclose credentials.Learn more about recovery fraud →
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Template-based draft • optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent · Review and submit it yourself
Related Infrastructure & Reports
Stored relationships are grouped by the exact matching attribute. A shared provider or registrar alone does not prove common ownership.
Direct link Shares a registration or an identical phishing kit.
Supporting signal Shares infrastructure or a target brand; not proof of one operator.
Discovery only Listed for navigation; no shared attribute with this host.
Infrastructure map · cryptobridge.online
Each lane is one reason a domain is linked to this host. Node size marks VirusTotal detections and dashed nodes are already offline. The full lists follow below.
(US)
