VirusTotal
1 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“CryptoBridge - Secure Wallet Connection Platform”
Faux airdrop: cryptobridge.online — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 1/95 (SOCRadar); 3 external blocklist matches (Polkadot, Enkrypt…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
1 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapportno community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportNo malicious flag
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of cryptobridge.online indicates the site was registered through NameCheap, Inc. on July 31, 2025 and is hosted on Amazon’s AS16509 network at IP 216.198.79.65, a United States address. The page title “CryptoBridge - Secure Wallet Connection Platform” suggests a cryptocurrency‑related service, and the intelligence tags the campaign as a “Fake Airdrop” impersonating Ethereum. No TLS certificate was observed, meaning the site was served over plain HTTP. VirusTotal recorded a single positive detection out of 95 scanned vendors, confirming at least one security product identified malicious behavior.
The domain is currently offline, and it has been added to four independent blocklists, specifically PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura. Nameservers are dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com, typical of the registrar’s default configuration. The available evidence confirms that the infrastructure is actively leveraged for a brand‑impersonation campaign, but the limited detection count suggests that many scanners have not yet flagged the site, possibly due to its short lifespan or evasion techniques.
No additional artifacts such as malicious payloads, credential‑harvesting forms, or redirect chains have been disclosed, leaving the precise attack vector uncertain. Defenders should update URL filtering policies to block cryptobridge.online and its associated IP address, enforce TLS‑only connections for cryptocurrency services, and monitor for any resurgence of the domain or similar patterns using the same registrar or hosting ASN. Continuous threat‑intel feeds should be consulted for new detections, and any inbound traffic to the listed IP should be inspected for anomalous request patterns consistent with airdrop‑style phishing attempts.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
La réputation Edge-IP n’est pas attribuée à ce domaine.
dns1.registrar-servers.comdns2.registrar-servers.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cryptobridge.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
cryptobridge.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/f7a35a45-b7fa-45a9-91bc-0fead554f2d7
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1/95 engine detections
View sourcecryptobridge.online
View source52 domaines ressemblants enregistrés
Signalé par 1 membre de la communauté ; première observation le 22/10/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
cryptobridge.online)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.