VirusTotal
9 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“OnChnia”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 5 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
підробка під Aave: onchnia.bond — Неперевірений. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 9/92 (alphaMountain.ai, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Google Safe…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
9 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звітThreat flag recorded
Відкрити звітШкідливий
Відкрити звітScan report
Відкрити звітno community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
onchnia.bond is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself under the name "OnChnia" and pitches crypto investment to wallet holders. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-14. As of 2026-10-19 the domain is still registered, but its DNS no longer serves the page, so the scam content is currently unreachable.
Pages built this way borrow a trusted-sounding crypto brand, here "OnChnia", to convince visitors they are dealing with a legitimate platform. urlscan.io tagged the site as both an investment scam and a crypto scam. Schemes of this kind typically push victims to deposit funds into a fake trading or yield account, then invent "fees" or "taxes" before any withdrawal. Some also ask visitors to connect a wallet and sign transactions, which can hand over tokens directly.
Nine of 92 VirusTotal engines flag the domain as of 2026-10-18. The vendors include ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Google Safe Browsing, alphaMountain.ai, Gridinsoft, Lionic and SOCRadar. Google Safe Browsing lists it for social engineering, and urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict. Beyond PhishDestroy, the domain sits on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists, so wallet users running those protections are warned before the page loads.
The domain was registered on 2026-04-17 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., about six months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests it was either held in reserve or circulated quietly before drawing attention. Traffic is routed through Cloudflare (AS13335) in the US, which hides the actual origin server behind a shared proxy address. Its Let's Encrypt certificate gives the site a padlock icon, but that proves nothing about its legitimacy.
If you deposited money through OnChnia, do not pay any "withdrawal fee" or "unlock" charge. Every extra payment goes to the same operators, so stop and document every transaction. If you connected a wallet, revoke any token approvals granted during the visit and move remaining assets to a fresh wallet. If you entered a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and empty it immediately. Report losses to your local cybercrime authority and to any exchange you sent funds from. Defenders should block onchnia.bond at DNS and proxy level and watch for similar OnChnia-branded domains.
Last checked
The linked repository preserves daily zone observations across seven ShortDot-operated TLDs, including registration volume and abuse-related indicators. This registry context is supporting background and is not an independent detection for the domain in this report.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Репутація Edge-IP не пов’язана з цим доменом.
amy.ns.cloudflare.comcleo.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
a9f4fb0917677f909b796b34004bfa6507584f62c865b43e2f87bf9eb25c5dd3Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of onchnia.bond · checked Oct 14, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
http://onchnia.bond/https://onchnia.bond/Content-Type: text/htmlServer: cloudflareCF-Cache-Status: DYNAMICContent-Encoding: gziph3=":443"; ma=86400DYNAMICa4a917c3aaaa8af6-YYZkeep-alivegziptext/htmlWed, 14 Oct 2026 19:46:55 GMTFri, 04 Sep 2026 17:49:48 GMT{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=Lcqx01%2F6bI%2FjRUDh8tNFzV9fb2gxsqdV03DJ3RMpAJWixlrATbnW%2BhR4gk%2Fef%2BcLyXojZKrZEDhwZl%2FjYnFZ%2FjRqyQRhgeomn55i3WztqfQ1qaRnDRx7WBMixtCuLjA%3cloudflarecfCacheStatus;desc="DYNAMIC"chunkedaccept-encodingValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No flag recorded→Flag recorded
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Доступний
Threat flag recorded
View source9/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261014-DCCEC5
Page captured
View sourceonchnia.bond
View sourceЗбережено 95 схожих доменів
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
onchnia.bond
PD-20261014-DCCEC5 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
onchnia.bond)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.