VirusTotal
1 / 93 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“YieldScan Terminal | Ecosystem Intelligence”
криптоінвестиційне шахрайство: yieldscan.finance — Контент недоступний. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 1/93 (SOCRadar); URLQuery 1 alert; PhishDestroy score…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
1 / 93 engine detections
Відкрити звіт1 threat-system alert
Відкрити звітSuspicious
Відкрити звіт3/14
no community references
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітPage capture
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| YARAhub by abuse.ch | yieldscan.finance/ |
malware | Detects file containing Telegram Bot API |
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis as of July 24, 2026 indicates that the domain yieldscan.finance was registered on February 23, 2026 through Hostinger operations, UAB and is currently taken offline. The domain resolves to the IPv4 address 92.113.23.14, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited located in Germany. DNS resolution is handled by ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, both typical of parking services. No SSL certificate was observed, meaning the site does not provide encrypted HTTPS connections. The page title returned from the host is "YieldScan Terminal | Ecosystem Intelligence," suggesting an attempt to present a legitimate financial‑technology interface.
Detected technologies include Hostinger CDN, Google Analytics, and HTTP/3, indicating use of common web‑hosting and analytics stacks but no specialized malicious kit. The domain is classified as an investment scam and appears on three independent security blocklists, with active blocking enforced by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. Reputation scoring from Gridinsoft assigns a score of 0 out of 100, reflecting extreme distrust. VirusTotal analysis shows that one of ninety‑three scanning engines flagged the domain, confirming at least one detection of malicious behavior.
The low trust score, absence of TLS, blocklist inclusion, and the single vendor flag collectively point to a high‑confidence malicious profile despite the limited number of detections. Uncertainty remains around the exact payload or credential‑harvesting mechanisms because no page content was captured; the analysis is limited to infrastructure and metadata. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeters, monitor DNS queries for the associated IP and nameservers, and ensure that any client‑side applications that might contact the site are patched or restricted. Ongoing surveillance of the IP address and related Hostinger assets is advised, as the infrastructure could be repurposed for future campaigns.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of yieldscan.finance · checked Mar 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Доступний→Недоступно
1→2
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/cbcd3c43-e508-4d6c-add2-c346bdf90e9f
No threat flag
View source1/93 engine detections
View sourceyieldscan.finance
View sourcePD-20260223-AC1FD7
Page captured
View sourceПовідомив 1 учасник спільноти; уперше помічено 23.02.2026
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
yieldscan.finance
PD-20260223-AC1FD7 Recipient: report@abuseradar.com Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
yieldscan.finance)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.