VirusTotal
6 / 95 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“MetaMask Login - Getting Started with MetaMask”
підробка під MetaMask: meta-logn-web.framer.website — Контент недоступний (HTTP 404). Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 6/95 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
6 / 95 engine detections
Відкрити звіт100 det.
Шкідливий
Відкрити звітno community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of meta-logn-web.framer.website indicates a deliberate brand‑impersonation campaign targeting MetaMask users. The site’s title, “MetaMask Login – Getting Started with MetaMask,” aligns with the known impersonation vector, and the domain was registered on 19 November 2021 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. Hosting resides on Amazon’s AS16509 network, resolving to 52.223.52.2, and the server presents a Let’s Encrypt certificate signed by the E7 cluster, supporting HSTS and HTTP/3. Technical fingerprints reveal a Framer Sites front‑end built with React, consistent with the observed infrastructure of other crypto‑focused phishing kits. VirusTotal scans flagged the domain in six of ninety‑five engines, and the address appears on at least one public blocklist.
PhishDestroy has already taken the site offline, and current HTTP response is a 404 error, confirming unavailability. The four AWS name servers (ns‑1243.awsdns‑27.org, ns‑1818.awsdns‑35.co.uk, ns‑336.awsdns‑42.com, ns‑792.awsdns) further corroborate the Amazon hosting claim. Defenders should continue to block the domain and its resolving IP, add the associated name‑server patterns to detection rules, and monitor the ASN for any re‑use of the address space.
Given the elevated risk rating, security appliances should enforce strict URL filtering for any MetaMask‑related login paths and alert on TLS certificates issued by Let’s Encrypt for similar sub‑domains. Although the site is currently offline, its prior activity demonstrates a functional phishing kit, and future re‑deployment is plausible. Ongoing intelligence gathering, including periodic re‑resolution and sandbox analysis of any revived content, is recommended to maintain coverage against this threat vector.
ns-1243.awsdns-27.orgns-1818.awsdns-35.co.ukns-336.awsdns-42.comns-792.awsdns-35.netLocation describes the IP network.
b3445573cc07ede57a843d22babf8e3b977a95a08dd21a6706de7226e732d6ceSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
hosting_placeholder: raw=placeholder; http=404; via=https_proxy; server=Framer/24ab00f
meta-logn-web.framer.website
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
Невідомо→inactive
hosting_placeholder · placeholder_page
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/eaa3f2b7-c258-474d-a370-a4ba22baf17d
Доступний→Недоступно
No threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View source6/95 engine detections
View sourcemeta-logn-web.framer.website
View sourceЗбережено 79 схожих доменів
Повідомив 1 учасник спільноти; уперше помічено 10.12.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
meta-logn-web.framer.website)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.