VirusTotal
21 / 95 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“Facebook – log in or sign up”
підробка під Facebook: g-mail.digital — Контент недоступний. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 21/95 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Certego, CRDF, CyRadar)…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
21 / 95 engine detections
Відкрити звіт100 det.
Threat flag recorded
Відкрити звітШкідливий
Відкрити звітchecked — no match recorded
17 community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
g-mail.digital is assessed as a high-risk domain for brand impersonation. This domain is designed to mimic Facebook, likely to deceive users into providing sensitive information such as login credentials or personal data. The risk level is high due to the domain's involvement in multiple threat intelligence reports and its current status of being flagged by security vendors.
Analysis indicates that g-mail.digital has been flagged in 17 threat intelligence pulses on AlienVault OTX, suggesting a significant level of malicious activity associated with the domain. VirusTotal reports that 21 out of 95 security vendors have flagged this domain, indicating a moderate level of consensus among security experts regarding its malicious nature. The domain is registered through Name.com, Inc and resolves to the IP address 16.16.167.230. It was created on November 30, 2025, which is a relatively recent date, often a common characteristic of malicious domains. Additionally, the domain appears on 2 security blocklists and lacks an SSL certificate, further raising concerns about its security and legitimacy. Google Safe Browsing has also flagged the domain for phishing, confirming the brand impersonation threat.
To mitigate the risk of brand impersonation associated with g-mail.digital, users should avoid clicking on any links or entering personal information on the site. Organizations should update their security policies to include this domain in their blocklists and educate employees about the dangers of brand impersonation attacks. Network administrators should monitor for any attempts to access this domain and implement DNS filtering to prevent access. Additionally, reporting the domain to the relevant brand (Facebook) and the domain registrar (Name.com, Inc) can help in taking further action to shut down the malicious activity and protect users.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1glr.name.comns2clp.name.comns3ghw.name.comns4cpw.name.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='g-mail.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError(
g-mail.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/d30b69bd-49b1-4967-8257-40caea10d28e
21/95 engine detections
View source17 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourceThreat flag recorded
View sourceg-mail.digital
View sourceПовідомив 1 учасник спільноти; уперше помічено 08.12.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
g-mail.digital)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.