VirusTotal
5 / 95 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“fi-ca.digital is a custom short domain”
домен у блоклистах: fi-ca.digital — Контент недоступний. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 5/95 (alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
5 / 95 engine detections
Відкрити звіт1 community reference
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain fi-ca.digital was observed resolving to the IPv4 address 207.174.61.1, which belongs to the Amazon Web Services network (ASN16509) located in the United States. Registration records indicate the domain was created on 11 December 2025 through NameCheap, Inc., and the authoritative name servers are dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com. The site presented the page title “fi-ca.digital is a custom short domain” and did not serve an SSL/TLS certificate, indicating HTTP‑only delivery. Threat intelligence sources have flagged the domain: it appears on a single security blocklist, is listed in one AlienVault OTX pulse, and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment.
VirusTotal scanned the URL with 95 engines, of which five returned positive detections, further corroborating the phishing classification. The current operational status is offline, suggesting the hosting has been taken down or the site has been disabled. Analysis indicates that the infrastructure relies on a cloud provider (AWS) and a low‑cost registrar, a pattern commonly used to reduce attribution and increase turnover of malicious short‑link services. The lack of TLS, the generic page title, and the low trust score point to a purpose-built redirector rather than a legitimate service. No additional content has been captured, so the exact phishing payload, target brand, or credential‑stealing mechanism remains unknown.
Defenders should prioritize immediate blocking of the domain and its resolved IP address at network perimeters. Adding the domain to internal DNS blocklists and updating endpoint security signatures to reflect the five VirusTotal detections will reduce exposure. Continuous monitoring of the associated AWS CIDR ranges for new short‑link domains registered through NameCheap can help identify future replicas.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.registrar-servers.comdns2.registrar-servers.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fi-ca.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
fi-ca.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/f5c2011a-8b8a-49bf-88af-519a0a735d91
5/95 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcefi-ca.digital
View sourceПовідомив 1 учасник спільноти; уперше помічено 14.12.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fi-ca.digital)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.