VirusTotal
2 / 91 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“Home – SENDCITY”
підробка під Celer: duplicate-disabled-7021.invalid — Контент недоступний. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 2/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
2 / 91 engine detections
Відкрити звітno community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain www.sendcity.online.techiesacademy.com is a phishing site engaged in brand impersonation targeting the Celer platform. It poses an elevated risk by mimicking Celer’s branding to deceive users into disclosing sensitive information or interacting with fraudulent content. No crypto drainer kit was identified. The site is currently taken offline, but prior activity indicates it was actively used for credential or login-based phishing under the guise of Celer.
Technical indicators confirm the domain’s malicious nature. As of analysis, 2 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors flagged www.sendcity.online.techiesacademy.com, including Fortinet and SOCRadar. It appears on one security blocklist, PhishDestroy, and holds a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100. The domain was registered on June 23, 2025, through OwnRegistrar, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 192.3.190.186, hosted on AS36352 (HostPapa) in the US. No SSL certificate is present, and the observed page title was 'Home – SENDCITY'. Nameservers are dns1.webproserver.com and dns2.webproserver.com.
Users who interacted with www.sendcity.online.techiesacademy.com should immediately change any credentials entered on the site, particularly for Celer-related accounts. Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on all affected services to prevent unauthorized access. Monitor accounts for suspicious activity, such as unauthorized transactions or login attempts. Report the domain to relevant platforms, including Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, or the impersonated brand’s security team (Celer). If financial or crypto assets were involved, review transaction histories and consider revoking any suspicious token approvals.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.webproserver.comdns2.webproserver.comnullLocation describes the IP network.
fee977ec67e5effda39411567dc667a32b939656a73a623a0ae2f5a6e38cee7fadamsauctionserv.comapi-helpdesk-link.coapresnola.comarcustommedical.comardiandinar.netbeya.onlinebioceuticals.onlineconnectcharter.netcoolcomics.mecpnsultacidadao.com.brcreativehobbies.netcruisetourescapades.xyzculturesadventure.xyzeatplantcuts.comenaquiler.comenvatobay.xyzexpeditiontravel.xyzfideleteavantage.comfinbrokers.aufireserver.xyzfutbollbre.netgovecsgb.comhdmp4mania.funifirstrowpt.euincidentmanagementalertsystems.comiptvspeed.storelacuerdas.netluxonline.sitemementocards.xyzmogznachitnado.xyznoromoko.competirinaja.xyzraeedalrawy.comshopgift.infosmasng.costarmaker.sitestrategicts.netteatrkapitol.pltech-tinker.xyzthebabyworks.cothesecretlocket.methriveboxing.comtiktokcoins.sitetop-nova.sitrackchairextreme.comubcablx.counboxer.net.auvitrizapps.xyzwowfeed.mezytx.meSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-7021.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-7021.invalid
2/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceduplicate-disabled-7021.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-7021.invalid)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.