VirusTotal
4 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“BAT Bilbao Architecture Team”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is compliance@tucows.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 4 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
підробка під Across: bat.archi — Останній відомий активний (HTTP 200). Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 4/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
4 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звітScan report
Відкрити звіт33 community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
bat.archi is an impersonation phishing page. It presents itself under the title "BAT Bilbao Architecture Team" and targets anyone who trusts that identity enough to interact with the site. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-16. On 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving live content. The page title points to an architecture studio, while our classification is impersonation phishing.
Impersonation pages copy the name, branding or look of a real organization so visitors believe they are dealing with it. Once that trust is in place, the page typically asks for login credentials, contact or payment details, or pushes the visitor toward a follow-up action that benefits the operator. Here the borrowed identity is "BAT Bilbao Architecture Team." Anything typed into a form on a page like this goes straight to whoever runs it. Victims can lose account access, personal information or money.
VirusTotal shows 4 of 92 engines flagging the domain as of 2026-10-16: alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF and Gridinsoft. That is a low detection count, so most security tools will not yet warn users who visit. PhishDestroy lists the domain on its blocklist. It also appears in 33 AlienVault OTX pulses, which shows wider threat-intelligence interest in it.
The domain was registered on 2019-03-02 through Tucows Domains Inc., so it is several years older than its first appearance in our detections. It resolves to 3.167.227.12 on AS16509 (Amazon.com, Inc.), with the server located in Germany. Its TLS certificate was issued by Amazon RSA 2048 M04. The padlock in the browser only means the connection is encrypted, not that the site is legitimate.
If you visited bat.archi but entered nothing, close the page and clear your browser's cached data for the site. If you entered a password, change it right away on the real service and on any other account where you reused it, then turn on two-factor authentication. If you shared payment details, contact your bank or card issuer and ask about blocking or monitoring the card. Defenders should block the domain at DNS, proxy and email gateways. They should also search their logs for past connections to it and report it to the hosting provider and registrar for review.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
anahi.ns.cloudflare.comeverton.ns.cloudflare.combat-archi.mail.protection.outlook.compriority 0Location describes the IP network.
2168b1da8e4842edc7046570845c0ea229346a6135387db960434d398050654fwww.bat.archiSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
2a57j77vlfaz09ss1wnpklqkas4u8n9.api.bat.archiDomain recordapi.bat.archiDomain recordbat.bat.archiDomain recordbrand.bat.archiDomain recorddev.bat.archiDomain recordnew.bat.archiDomain recordpre.bat.archiDomain recordwww.bat.archiDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of bat.archi · checked Oct 16, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
http://bat.archi/https://bat.archi/Content-Type: text/htmlServer: AmazonS3keep-alive35097text/htmlFri, 16 Oct 2026 01:29:00 GMT"528bf3051547d12643ccba8e32a8dfab"Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:04:24 GMTAmazonS31.1 a6cf64e69a19d3b39479c6c39a829974.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)0-UTA9Y8E0-Q-qOEwt7DK6j0386ZOm7ity2qzABQ8buD6i-S60HqHg==FRA60-P11Miss from cloudfrontValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=AmazonS3
bat.archi
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Доступний
4/92 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source33 community references
View sourcePD-20261016-8FE957
Page captured
View sourcebat.archi
View sourcePD-20261016-8FE957 Recipient: compliance@tucows.com Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc (Canada) Policy Violations: Participates in DNS Abuse Framework; explicitly recognizes phishing, malware, botnets, pharming, spam-as-vector as abuse requiring registrar action Applicable Laws: Criminal Code §342.1 (unauthorized access), §380 (fraud)
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
bat.archi)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.