VirusTotal
7 / 93 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“Starknet (STRK) to Bounce Back? RSI Divergence Hinting at a Potential Upward Move”
підробка під Celer: app-stark.online — Контент недоступний. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 7/93 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar, Forcepoint…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
7 / 93 engine detections
Відкрити звітno community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
On July 24, 2026, analysis of the domain app-stark.online confirms a brand‑impersonation operation targeting the cryptocurrency platform celer. The site was registered on 22 December 2025 via HOSTINGER operations, UAB and resolves to the IPv4 address 92.113.16.248, which belongs to AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in Germany. DNS resolution is served by ns1.dns‑parking.com and ns2.dns‑parking.com, typical of parked or low‑cost hosting. No TLS certificate was observed, indicating that the site was delivered over plain HTTP. The only visible content indexed by security tools is the page title “Starknet (STRK) to Bounce Back?
RSI Divergence Hinting at a Potential Upward Move”, which appears unrelated to celer and suggests a content‑spoofing tactic aimed at attracting crypto‑interested users. Reputation checks show a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 / 100 and inclusion on a single security blocklist. The domain is listed as blocked by the PhishDestroy service, and 7 of 93 VirusTotal scanners flagged the host as malicious, reinforcing the suspicion of abuse. The site’s current HTTP status is offline, but the historical presence on blocklists indicates that it was previously reachable and active. Uncertainties remain regarding the exact payload delivered to visitors, as no SSL handshake, login page, or malware sample has been captured.
The limited number of detections suggests that the site may have been operational for a short window before takedown. Defenders should add app‑stark.online to network‑level deny lists, monitor outbound connections to 92.113.16.248, and flag any DNS queries to its parking nameservers. Because the registrar is Hostinger, future domains created under the same account should be scrutinised. Continuous re‑scanning of the IP address is advised to detect any resurgence of malicious content.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='app-stark.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
app-stark.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/634ffdff-2882-4a89-a20a-334308e9eade
7/93 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceapp-stark.online
View sourceПовідомив 1 учасник спільноти; уперше помічено 24.12.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
app-stark.online)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.