VirusTotal
2 / 94
“Jito MEV Harvesting | Harvest Liquid Staked SOL - Maximise your Revenue”
votes-jito.network — Conteúdo indisponível. Representação da marca: Jito; Tipo de golpe: Brand Impersonation. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 2/94 (Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 61/100. Registrador: PDR.
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
2 / 94
1/100
Denunciarchecked — no detections recorded
Denunciarchecked — no match recorded
no community references
Denunciarprovider verdict: suspicious
Denunciarrelatório armazenado
Denunciar Análise concluída
Denunciar12 verificado — sem bloqueios
Checked; no threat flag recorded
Denunciarvotes-jito.network has been identified as an active brand impersonation domain targeting the Jito ecosystem. The domain is currently under investigation and poses a credible threat to users who may mistake it for an official Jito service portal.
This domain exhibits multiple red flags: it impersonates the Jito brand, which is a well-known Solana validator and liquid staking protocol; it resolves to the IP address 172.67.205.246; the SSL certificate is issued by Let's Encrypt; it was registered through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com on March 24, 2026; and at present, it remains undetected by 2 out of 95 VirusTotal scanners. No known blocklists or threat intelligence feeds currently flag this domain, and it has not been assigned a trust score due to its recent registration and low detection rate.
To mitigate exposure to this threat, users should immediately refrain from visiting votes-jito.network and avoid interacting with any links or emails referencing this domain. Organizations should consider blocking the IP address 172.67.205.246 and the domain at the network perimeter. Security teams are advised to monitor for any related infrastructure or additional impersonation domains mimicking Jito. Additionally, end-users should verify the authenticity of any Jito-related domains by cross-referencing with official Jito communication channels and ensuring the use of HTTPS with valid certificates from trusted issuers.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/thejitocommunityStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-01 04:20:55 UTC
Observações armazenadas comparando o rastreador com o navegador para este host, além de uma verificação em tempo real da assinatura digital para sistemas de distribuição de tráfego do tipo Keitaro.
Nota do digitalizador: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='votes-jito.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
A reputação do Edge-IP não é atribuída a este domínio.
lou.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
7a9a30c5d04af98faff2c35a6236c316727cc1b45cdb9c3599a829ce0e20f886Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of votes-jito.network · checked Mar 26, 2026
11 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Denunciado por 1 membro da comunidade; visto pela primeira vez em 26/03/2026
PD-20260326-49E0C7 Recipient: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com Registrar: PublicDomainRegistry (PDR Ltd.) (India) Policy Violations: Explicit policy to immediately suspend domains used for phishing, 419 scams, identity fraud, malware distribution without prior notice Applicable Laws: IT Act 2000 §§66C–66D (identity theft, cheating by personation), Indian Penal Code §420 / Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita §318 (fraud)
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo