VirusTotal
13 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“Based Rewards Proposal | Eligible Voters Receive Rewards”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@spaceship.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 11 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
based.asia — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 브랜드 사칭: Base; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 13/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 3 det.; 3 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Spaceship.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
13 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기3 det.
보고서 열기4 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
based.asia is an impersonation phishing page that poses as a governance vote for the Based project. Its headline is "Based Rewards Proposal | Eligible Voters Receive Rewards". It targets holders and community members who expect governance votes to come with incentives. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-07, and it was still online and serving its content when checked on 2026-10-19.
The lure is a fake governance proposal that tells visitors they are eligible voters and can collect a reward by taking part. Pages of this kind usually ask the visitor to connect a wallet to "verify eligibility" or "cast a vote." They then present a signature or transaction request that the visitor believes is a ballot. In practice, that request can grant token approvals or sign over assets, so the victim loses wallet funds rather than gaining a reward. Real governance votes do not require you to approve token spending to receive rewards.
13 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-11, including BitDefender, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Emsisoft, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and Gridinsoft. That count is modest, but these vendors work independently of each other. The site also appears on the MetaMask, ScamSniffer and SEAL blocklists alongside PhishDestroy, which is a strong sign the crypto security community considers it a wallet threat. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference the domain, so other researchers are tracking it too.
The domain was registered through Spaceship, Inc. on 2026-10-06, only a day before PhishDestroy detected it. That timing fits a site built specifically for this campaign rather than a compromised older website. Traffic is fronted by Cloudflare (AS13335) on US-based addresses, which hides the actual origin server. The Let's Encrypt certificate only means the padlock is present and says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you connected a wallet and signed anything on based.asia, open a token-approval checker straight away and revoke any allowances granted around the time of your visit. If you suspect a signature exposed your assets, move what remains to a fresh wallet. Treat any "voter reward" claim as suspect unless it appears on the Based project's official channels. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and warn communities where fake governance links circulate. Abuse reports can be sent to the registrar and to Cloudflare.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a11647-ebf2-715e-8534-3300e4d67ccd/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/based.asia
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=based.asia
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20261009151050/https://based.asia/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/BasedOneXStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-10-08 04:00:48 UTC
Last checked
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
malavika.ns.cloudflare.comtadeo.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
644695557bbaf4d2791eef88b8e454134a1aa284429c85e22acdd0866158754bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.based.asiaDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of based.asia · checked Oct 7, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
based.asia
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→inactive
http_no_content
접속 가능
No threat flag
View source13/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261007-9B2864
Page captured
View sourcebased.asia
View sourcePD-20261007-9B2864 Recipient: abuse@spaceship.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (US): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 15 U.S.C. § 45 - FTC Act (Deceptive Practices) Federal laws prohibit wire fraud, computer fraud, and deceptive business practices. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
based.asia)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.