This domain, videomeet.online, is identified as a generic phishing resource targeting users of video conferencing services. Analysis indicates the infrastructure is designed to mimic legitimate meeting platforms, likely to harvest credentials or distribute malicious payloads under the guise of authentication prompts or software updates. No specific brand impersonation or drainer kit signatures have been confirmed at this stage, though the domain name suggests an intent to exploit trust in widely used communication tools. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on May 14, 2026, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a registrar frequently observed in low-reputation registrations. It resolves to the IP address 187.127.148.171, which has been associated with prior malicious activity in threat intelligence pulses. Despite its recent creation, the domain has already appeared on three security blocklists and is referenced in one AlienVault OTX pulse. Notably, VirusTotal currently reports 0 detections out of 95 engines, suggesting the campaign may still be in an early or evasive phase. Google Safe Browsing status remains unconfirmed, but the domain has been proactively blocked by multiple independent security feeds. As of the latest assessment, videomeet.online has been taken offline, likely in response to detection by security entities. However, the residual risk persists due to the domain's recent registration and the registrar's history with transient malicious domains. Users who may have interacted with the site are advised to verify system integrity, rotate credentials for any services accessed during the exposure window, and monitor for unauthorized activity. Organizations should update blocklists to include this domain and its associated IP to prevent potential re-emergence or lateral movement within networks.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:09 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-23 10:02:37 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-23 10:02:37 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,382.21hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-12 01:08:46 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='videomeet.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
videomeet.online
Stored observation history10
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
