ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@hostinger.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 3 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
The domain vipmeet.online hosted a site titled "WA Meet," which likely impersonated a legitimate meeting or chat service to deceive users. This site posed a threat by potentially harvesting credentials, personal information, or distributing malware through fake login pages or malicious downloads.
Technical evidence shows the site was flagged by 10 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors, including ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, and Forcepoint ThreatSeeker. The domain was registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC on 2026-06-22, hosted on IP 187.127.148.171 (IN) under AS47583 Hostinger International Limited, and used nameservers ns51.domaincontrol.com and ns52.domaincontrol.com. No SSL certificate was detected.
The site is currently DOWN/OFFLINE with a DOM risk score of 90. Given the high detection rate and risk score, this domain is considered a high-threat entity and should be blocked or monitored if reactivated.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年6月23日score 100/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://vipmeet.online/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:36:50 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:36:50 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:36:50 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
