adobereview.online appears to mimic an Adobe review page and is aimed at Adobe product users. PhishDestroy added the domain to its blocklist on 2026-10-19. The site is still alive but its content could not be retrieved when checked on 2026-10-19. The page title references an Adobe review, reinforcing the impersonation attempt.
How the scam works
The site likely presents a fake Adobe login or review form to capture usernames, passwords, and possibly linked wallet addresses. Victims who submit credentials risk account takeover and unauthorized transactions. By capturing wallet addresses the attackers could also initiate unauthorized crypto transfers if the victim links a wallet.
Evidence
VirusTotal flagged the domain with one detection out of 92 scanners, notably SOCRadar. OTX reports four pulses referencing the domain. PhishDestroy has listed it on its blocklist. No additional detections from Google Safe Browsing, urlscan.io or Spamhaus are recorded.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-10-17 through Hostinger operations, UAB, only two days before PhishDestroy first observed it. It resolves to the IP address 104.21.35.44, indicating hosting on a cloud provider. The short window between registration and detection suggests a fast‑flux or throwaway operation.
What to do
If you visited adobereview.online and entered any Adobe credentials, change those passwords immediately and enable two‑factor authentication on the affected accounts. Review recent account activity for unauthorized access and revoke any unknown OAuth authorizations. Security teams should add the domain to web‑filter and DNS blocklists, monitor for traffic to 104.21.35.44, and share indicators with threat‑intel communities.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月19日score 96/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttps://adobereview.online/
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeReachable but protectedreason: Cloudflare Challenge85% confidence
AttributionCloudflaremechanism: Challengesource: Current Http Probe
Evidence layersAvailability: Reachable but protectedContent: UnknownDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationReachable but protectedCloudflare ChallengeCloudflareChallenge85%2026-10-19 23:02:59 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 23:02:59 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
脅威情報の照合 · source references
ScamAdviserPublic lookup
A public ScamAdviser lookup is available. Review its current score and warnings at the source; the existence of a lookup page is not itself a malicious verdict.
Live-fetched via CF worker proxy pool · cached 24h
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.adobereview.onlineDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
使用技術 · 2 identified
Cloudflare
CDN
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
