On August 04, 2026, the domain www.focusel.space is flagged as a potential phishing site. This domain was registered through HOSTINGER operations, UAB on July 06, 2026. Currently, it resolves to the IP address 66.33.60.66 and is hosted on nameservers apollo.dns-parking.com, athena.dns-parking.com, ns1.vercel-dns-3.com, and ns2.vercel-dns. The domain appears on one security blocklist, specifically PhishDestroy, indicating that it has been identified as a phishing threat by at least one security provider. Despite this, the domain is still active, which suggests ongoing malicious activity.
Analysis indicates that the domain's infrastructure and registration details are consistent with patterns often used by phishing operators. The use of HOSTINGER operations, UAB for domain registration and the choice of nameservers point to a setup that may be leveraged for quick and temporary deployment, a common tactic in phishing operations. The IP address 66.33.60.66 has not been provided with additional context such as ASN or country information, leaving these details uncertain. Defenders should be cautious and consider blocking access to www.focusel.space to prevent potential phishing attacks.
It is recommended to monitor the domain for any changes in its status or infrastructure. Additionally, organizations should educate users about the risks of phishing and how to recognize and report suspicious domains. The exact content and purpose of the phishing site have not been analyzed, so further investigation is warranted to determine the specific nature of the threat. This domain's presence on a security blocklist should be taken seriously, and proactive measures should be implemented to mitigate any potential risks.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年8月4日score 83/1003 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://www.focusel.space/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
