Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
网络安全情报 Registrar context
Registrar contextNameSilo
Stored registration data identifies NameSilo as the registrar. PhishDestroy maintains separate registrar investigations; that broader material is contextual and is not an independent detection for this domain.
Analysis of the domain credopass.online, conducted on July 23, 2026, reveals that it has been used for a brand impersonation campaign targeting OneDrive. The domain was registered through NameSilo, LLC on July 07, 2025, and has since been taken offline. Infrastructure analysis reveals that the domain resolved to the IP address 47.253.40.255, which is associated with US-based hosting provider AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd. Despite the current offline status, historical data indicates that the domain was flagged by 15 out of 93 security vendors on VirusTotal, suggesting a moderate level of recognition and classification as a potential threat. The SSL certificate for the domain is rated E8, which may indicate a low to moderate level of trust in the certificate authority or the certificate itself.
The domain has also been mentioned in four threat intelligence pulses on AlienVault OTX, further corroborating its involvement in malicious activities. The exact content of the web page is not yet analyzed, but the page title was found to be 'OneDrive,' aligning with the brand impersonation threat type. The domain's current status as 'taken offline' and its appearance on one security blocklist, including being blocked by PhishDestroy, suggest active measures by security platforms to mitigate the risk.
Gridinsoft's trust score for credopass.online is 0/100, indicating a complete lack of trust in the domain. Defenders should remain vigilant and ensure that this domain is included in their threat intelligence feeds and blocklists to prevent any potential residual impact from the brand impersonation campaign. Any previous interactions with this domain should be reviewed for signs of compromise, and users should be educated to recognize and avoid similar scams targeting OneDrive or other well-known brands.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 83/1001 brand signal
ICANN OVERSIGHT
认证和 RAA 背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:10 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-21 20:05:21 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-21 20:05:21 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,884.16hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-11 18:10:08 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='credopass.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
credopass.online
Stored observation history10
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
PhishDestroy Investigation
