VirusTotal
4 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“One page website for free – Online website builder”
被列入黑名单的域名: cainbaseprologin.onepage.website — 隐形 · 可达 (HTTP 302). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 4/91 (ChainPatrol, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, Seclookup); CF Radar malicious…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
4 / 91 engine detections
打开报告恶意
打开报告no community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged as a high-risk brand impersonation targeting Facebook. Analysis of available evidence reveals several indicators consistent with phishing infrastructure. The domain resolves to IP address 136.144.226.23, hosted in the Netherlands by AS20857 Signet B.V., a provider often associated with low-reputation hosting. The HTTP response returns a 302 redirect status, which is commonly used in phishing campaigns to redirect victims to credential harvesting pages after an initial visit. The SSL certificate is issued by Sectigo Limited, a legitimate certificate authority, but the presence of a valid certificate does not reduce the threat posed by the domain itself.
The domain was registered on September 17, 2014 through Hosting Concepts B.V. (d/b/a Registrar.eu), and its nameservers are ns.compra.be, ns.compra.eu, ns.compra.nl, and ns.compra.uk. The page title displayed is "One page website for free – Online website builder", which is generic and does not match the impersonated brand, a technique often used to evade automated detection. The domain appears on one security blocklist (PhishDestroy) and is flagged by 7 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, indicating moderate but meaningful detection across the security industry. The Gridinsoft trust score is 0/100, reinforcing the assessment of high risk. Technologies detected on the domain include Plesk, PHP, Bootstrap, Nginx, Sendgrid, Pingdom RUM, jQuery, and Google Analytics.
While some of these are benign content delivery or analytics tools, their presence does not rule out malicious use. The exact phishing kit or landing page content has not been analysed, and no specific URL paths or form submission targets have been observed. Defenders should block access to this domain at the network level, monitor for related subdomains or variations of the cainbaseprologin.onepage.website naming pattern, and ensure that Facebook users are aware of this impersonation campaign.
For the registrable domain onepage.website behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns.compra.bens.compra.euns.compra.nlns.compra.ukLocation describes the IP network.
77c8738b82c718724ad018c951a561fb9489567619935ef155ee15eccd9dc3aaonepage.websiteSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of cainbaseprologin.onepage.website · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
content_divergence · redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://onepage.website/; server=nginx
cainbaseprologin.onepage.website
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source4/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcecainbaseprologin.onepage.website
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2025年12月14日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
cainbaseprologin.onepage.website)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.