VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“小寺歯科医院 | 兵庫県三田市 口臭治療 小児歯科 インプラント”
钓鱼: kodera.jp — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 301). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 15/91 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar); PhishDestroy score 100/100.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
15 / 91 engine detections
打开报告32 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
kodera.jp is classified by PhishDestroy as an impersonation phishing page. Its page title presents it as 小寺歯科医院, a dental clinic in Sanda, Hyogo Prefecture, advertising bad-breath treatment, pediatric dentistry and implants. That local, trustworthy-sounding identity is what visitors see first, even though we classify the domain as impersonation. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-20, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and its content resolved through a redirect.
Impersonation phishing borrows the name and look of an organization people already trust, then steers them toward a form or page where they hand over something valuable. That is usually login credentials, personal details or payment information, which the operators then reuse or sell. Here the domain currently answers with a redirect, so a visitor who arrives expecting a clinic's website can be passed on to a different destination without noticing.
On 2026-09-29, 15 of 91 VirusTotal engines marked the domain as malicious or phishing. The vendors include ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and Fortinet, a mix of commercial antivirus firms, URL-reputation services and a community anti-scam group. The domain also appears in 32 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so many independent researchers have tied it to malicious activity. Among the blocklists tracked here, it is listed by PhishDestroy.
The domain was registered on 2006-06-27, roughly twenty years before PhishDestroy flagged it. That makes it an aged, long-standing name rather than a throwaway domain created for a single campaign, and it explains why reputation filters may have trusted it. It is hosted in Japan on the KDDI CORPORATION network, which fits the local business named in its title.
If you followed a link to kodera.jp and typed in a password, change it right away on every site where you use it, and turn on two-factor authentication. If you entered card or banking details, contact your card issuer to block the card and watch your statements for unfamiliar charges. Treat any later emails or messages that refer to the clinic or to your visit with suspicion. Defenders should block the domain and anything it redirects to, search proxy and DNS logs for users who reached it after 2026-09-20, and reset credentials for anyone who submitted a form there.
dns136.n-server.comdns20.n-server.comns.kodera.jpmail.kodera.jppriority 10Location describes the IP network.
c919195e841b93716a52effc149c2960bffe92211ec52e3536387a2ff9fbe818www.kodera.jpSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.kodera.jpDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of kodera.jp · checked Sep 20, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_301; http=301; via=https_proxy; location=https://www.kodera.jp/; server=nginx
kodera.jp
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
14→15
13→14
可访问
No threat flag
View source15/91 engine detections
View source32 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcekodera.jp
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
kodera.jp)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.