VirusTotal
15 / 90
“HyperLend”
app-hyperlends.finance — 可达 · 访问受限 (HTTP 403). 诈骗类型:Generic Phishing. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 15/90 (alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF); Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 95/100. 注册商: NiceNIC.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
Analysis of app-hyperlends.finance indicates it is an active generic phishing infrastructure with a high risk rating. The domain was registered on June 9, 2026 through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED and resolves to the Cloudflare‑owned address 172.67.158.114 (AS13335, United States). DNS is served by keaton.ns.cloudflare.com and oaklyn.ns.cloudflare.com. A TLS certificate issued by Google Trust Services / WE1 is present, and an HTTP 301 response is observed, suggesting a redirect but the target page content has not been publicly disclosed. The page title returned by the server is "HyperLend", which aligns with the domain name but provides no further context about the intended victim or lure. The site is listed on three security blocklists and has been flagged by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. AlienVault OTX references the domain in two threat pulses, and VirusTotal reports four detections out of ninety‑one scanned vendors. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100. These data points collectively confirm malicious intent consistent with phishing campaigns. Defenders should block the domain at network borders, include it in URL filtering policies, and monitor for any associated payloads or credential harvesting activity. Ongoing observation is advised to capture any evolution of the site’s content or additional infrastructure components.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
cloudflare扫描说明: cloudflare_ban: raw=cf_phishing_block; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare; provider_error=cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
扫描期间服务提供商的响应: cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
keaton.ns.cloudflare.comoaklyn.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
bd65f275b9a198c9a411770bc9c59aca14182b2f0e78e796f96eaa9d7e0e0de1Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2026年6月11日
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent