VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
Mở báo cáo“Flare — XRP Staking”
Lừa đảo đầu tư tiền mã hóa: xrpvault.network — Nội dung không có sẵn. Tóm tắt bằng chứng: VirusTotal 11/91 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender…
Phân tích chi tiết của PhishDestroy AI bên dưới được giữ bằng tiếng Anh để bảo toàn hồ sơ pháp chứng gốc.
11 / 91 engine detections
Mở báo cáoThreat flag recorded
Mở báo cáo25 community references
Mở báo cáoprovider verdict: clean
Mở báo cáoNo malicious flag
Mở báo cáoResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, xrpvault.network, is identified as part of an investment scam infrastructure targeting users with a fraudulent XRP staking scheme. Registered on February 21, 2026, through NiceNIC International Group Co., Limited, the domain resolves to the IP address 216.198.79.65, hosted on Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) in the United States. Analysis of its infrastructure reveals the use of Cloudflare nameservers (zara.ns.cloudflare.com and damien.ns.cloudflare.com) and deployment on Vercel, with HSTS enabled. The SSL certificate is classified as R13, and the HTTP status code returned is 451, indicating unavailability due to legal or policy restrictions.
The page title, 'Flare — XRP Staking,' suggests an attempt to impersonate or leverage the Flare Network brand, a known blockchain platform, to deceive victims into engaging with the scam. Google Safe Browsing has flagged the domain for social engineering, aligning with its classification as an investment scam. Detection by security vendors is notable, with 10 out of 93 vendors on VirusTotal marking the domain as malicious. Additionally, the domain appears on four security blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura.
As of July 23, 2026, the domain is offline, though its prior activity and infrastructure remain a concern. Defenders should prioritize monitoring for re-emergence or similar domains leveraging the same hosting, registrar, or nameserver patterns. Organizations are advised to update blocklists with this domain and investigate any historical connections to internal networks or user reports. Given the use of Cloudflare and Vercel, further scrutiny of domains sharing these infrastructure components is recommended to identify related threats.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Danh tiếng của Edge-IP không được quy cho tên miền này.
damien.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
xrpvault.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Không rõ→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Không rõ→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Không rõ→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Không có sẵn→Có thể truy cập
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/a2ab99f9-c84a-406c-a26c-89a7c1250187
Có thể truy cập→Không có sẵn
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/a2ab99f9-c84a-406c-a26c-89a7c1250187
25 community references
View source11/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceThreat flag recorded
View sourcexrpvault.network
View sourceĐược 1 thành viên cộng đồng báo cáo; ghi nhận lần đầu 16/09/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Nếu bạn đã nhập thông tin xác thực tài khoản, thông tin cá nhân hoặc thông tin thanh toán hoặc đã tải xuống tệp từ miền này, hãy hành động ngay lập tức. Dưới đây là các nguồn lực giúp bạn báo cáo vụ việc và bảo vệ chính mình.
Chọn quốc gia của bạn để nhận liên hệ tội phạm mạng chính thức hoặc soạn thảo đơn khiếu nại →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
xrpvault.network)Dù bạn chưa nắm rõ tất cả các chi tiết — vẫn nên nộp báo cáo. Ngay cả những thông tin không đầy đủ cũng vẫn có ích cho công tác điều tra.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Phân tích mối đe dọa bằng cách sử dụng danh sách chặn được lưu trữ, WHOIS, DNS và bằng chứng quét công khai
Quét ngayHãy gửi các tên miền đáng ngờ đến cơ sở dữ liệu mối đe dọa của chúng tôi — để bảo vệ cộng đồng
Báo cáoCác báo cáo lừa đảo gần đây và những thay đổi về tính khả dụng được quan sát thấy
Theo dõiTheo dõi các mối đe dọa đang diễn ra hoặc phản đối danh sách này nếu bạn cho rằng đây là kết quả báo động sai
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.