VirusTotal
12 / 89 engine detections
Mở báo cáo“Trust Wallet AI Beta Partner Recruitment”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Giả mạo Trust Wallet: trust.organic — Hoạt động được biết đến lần cuối (HTTP 200). Tóm tắt bằng chứng: VirusTotal 12/89 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai…
Phân tích chi tiết của PhishDestroy AI bên dưới được giữ bằng tiếng Anh để bảo toàn hồ sơ pháp chứng gốc.
12 / 89 engine detections
Mở báo cáoDBL_PHISH
checked — no detections recorded
Mở báo cáo4 community references
Mở báo cáoprovider verdict: clean
Mở báo cáo80/100
Mở báo cáoNo threat flag
Mở báo cáoNo malicious flag
Mở báo cáoResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
trust.organic is a phishing page that impersonates Trust Wallet. It presents itself as a Trust Wallet AI Beta Partner Recruitment program and targets people who hold crypto in Trust Wallet. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-02. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
The page invites visitors to join an exclusive AI beta or partner program, a pitch built to make an unsolicited offer feel like an insider opportunity. Fake recruitment pages like this usually ask the visitor to verify their wallet to qualify. That step means either typing in the recovery phrase or connecting the wallet and signing a request. A recovery phrase gives the attacker full control of every asset in the wallet. A signed approval can let them move tokens without asking again. Trust Wallet does not recruit beta partners through standalone domains, and it never asks for a recovery phrase.
On 2026-09-14, 12 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. Detections came from ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, Ermes, ESET, Fortinet and G-Data, a mix of crypto-focused and mainstream security vendors. Spamhaus lists it in its domain blocklist as phishing. MetaMask and SEAL block it alongside PhishDestroy. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses also reference it, so other researchers have tracked it independently.
The domain was registered through GNAME.COM PTE. LTD. on 2026-09-02, the same day PhishDestroy detected it. That timing points to a site that went live as soon as it was registered. It sits behind Cloudflare (AS13335, US), so its address belongs to Cloudflare's shared network and does not reveal the real origin server. The valid Google Trust Services certificate only means the connection is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site.
If you entered your recovery phrase on trust.organic, treat the wallet as compromised. Create a new wallet with a fresh phrase and move any remaining funds to it immediately. If you only connected your wallet or signed a transaction, revoke the token approvals you granted from that session. Watch the wallet for transfers you did not make. Report the page to Trust Wallet support, and warn anyone who sent you the recruitment link. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and the web proxy, and add it to wallet and browser protection lists.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Danh tiếng của Edge-IP không được quy cho tên miền này.
jo.ns.cloudflare.comrene.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
e8d086fc9ca5f017a6dd3ca6ca2822696dda21d5dfb840320eb29561c0abe945Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of trust.organic · checked Sep 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
trust.organic
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
Không rõ→live_content
content_served
0→1
Có thể truy cập
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source12/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260902-35B300
trust.organic
View sourcePage captured
View source104 tên miền tương tự đã lưu
Hiển thị 100 trong tổng số 104
PD-20260902-35B300 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Nếu bạn đã nhập thông tin xác thực tài khoản, thông tin cá nhân hoặc thông tin thanh toán hoặc đã tải xuống tệp từ miền này, hãy hành động ngay lập tức. Dưới đây là các nguồn lực giúp bạn báo cáo vụ việc và bảo vệ chính mình.
Chọn quốc gia của bạn để nhận liên hệ tội phạm mạng chính thức hoặc soạn thảo đơn khiếu nại →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
trust.organic)Dù bạn chưa nắm rõ tất cả các chi tiết — vẫn nên nộp báo cáo. Ngay cả những thông tin không đầy đủ cũng vẫn có ích cho công tác điều tra.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Phân tích mối đe dọa bằng cách sử dụng danh sách chặn được lưu trữ, WHOIS, DNS và bằng chứng quét công khai
Quét ngayHãy gửi các tên miền đáng ngờ đến cơ sở dữ liệu mối đe dọa của chúng tôi — để bảo vệ cộng đồng
Báo cáoCác báo cáo lừa đảo gần đây và những thay đổi về tính khả dụng được quan sát thấy
Theo dõiTheo dõi các mối đe dọa đang diễn ra hoặc phản đối danh sách này nếu bạn cho rằng đây là kết quả báo động sai
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.