VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
Mở báo cáo“Suspected Phishing | Cloudflare”
Tên miền trong danh sách chặn: chainguard.digital — Nội dung không có sẵn. Tóm tắt bằng chứng: VirusTotal 3/89 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Kaspersky, VIPRE); 2…
Phân tích chi tiết của PhishDestroy AI bên dưới được giữ bằng tiếng Anh để bảo toàn hồ sơ pháp chứng gốc.
3 / 89 engine detections
Mở báo cáochecked — no detections recorded
Mở báo cáono community references
Mở báo cáoprovider verdict: clean
Mở báo cáoNo threat flag
Mở báo cáoNo malicious flag
Mở báo cáoResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
chainguard.digital is an impersonation phishing site that borrows a security-flavoured name to look like a trusted service to crypto users. MetaMask and SEAL both list it, which places its audience squarely among wallet holders. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-19. The site has been offline since 2026-09-20 and was still unreachable when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Impersonation pages copy the look and wording of a legitimate brand so that visitors act as they would on the real service. Typical prompts ask the visitor to connect a wallet, sign a transaction, enter a recovery phrase or log in. Each of these hands the operator either direct control of the wallet or the credentials to reach it. The page title reads "Suspected Phishing | Cloudflare", which is Cloudflare's own warning interstitial, while our classification concerns the impersonating content behind it.
Only 3 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain on 2026-09-19: Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Kaspersky and VIPRE. That low count means most generic security tools would have let it through. The stronger signal comes from the crypto-specific side, where it appears on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists alongside PhishDestroy's own.
The domain was registered on 2026-08-30 through Global Domain Group LLC, and we caught it 20 days later. It went dark the day after detection, which fits a short-lived campaign domain rather than an established service. Traffic was routed through Cloudflare, Inc., with the address resolving to Canada, so the true origin server sits behind the proxy.
If you connected a wallet to this site, review your active token approvals with a revocation tool and cancel any you do not recognise. If you typed a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you entered a password, change it everywhere you reuse it and turn on app-based 2FA. Defenders should block chainguard.digital at DNS and proxy level and search their logs for visits around 2026-09-19 to 2026-09-20.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Danh tiếng của Edge-IP không được quy cho tên miền này.
andronicus.ns.cloudflare.comimani.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
97720e3732179f3f002bcb2f28f4e45ec34b941b7d0e21bc2d51cabdd68f2973Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of chainguard.digital · checked Sep 19, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
chainguard.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Có thể truy cập→Không có sẵn
Có thể truy cập
PD-20260919-4808DC
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourcechainguard.digital
View sourcePD-20260919-4808DC Recipient: abuse@globaldomaingroup.com Nếu bạn đã nhập thông tin xác thực tài khoản, thông tin cá nhân hoặc thông tin thanh toán hoặc đã tải xuống tệp từ miền này, hãy hành động ngay lập tức. Dưới đây là các nguồn lực giúp bạn báo cáo vụ việc và bảo vệ chính mình.
Chọn quốc gia của bạn để nhận liên hệ tội phạm mạng chính thức hoặc soạn thảo đơn khiếu nại →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
chainguard.digital)Dù bạn chưa nắm rõ tất cả các chi tiết — vẫn nên nộp báo cáo. Ngay cả những thông tin không đầy đủ cũng vẫn có ích cho công tác điều tra.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Phân tích mối đe dọa bằng cách sử dụng danh sách chặn được lưu trữ, WHOIS, DNS và bằng chứng quét công khai
Quét ngayHãy gửi các tên miền đáng ngờ đến cơ sở dữ liệu mối đe dọa của chúng tôi — để bảo vệ cộng đồng
Báo cáoCác báo cáo lừa đảo gần đây và những thay đổi về tính khả dụng được quan sát thấy
Theo dõiTheo dõi các mối đe dọa đang diễn ra hoặc phản đối danh sách này nếu bạn cho rằng đây là kết quả báo động sai
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.