VirusTotal
5 / 90 engine detections
Mở báo cáo“Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD”
Tên miền trong danh sách chặn: caixageral.digital — Nội dung không có sẵn. Tóm tắt bằng chứng: VirusTotal 5/90 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint…
Phân tích chi tiết của PhishDestroy AI bên dưới được giữ bằng tiếng Anh để bảo toàn hồ sơ pháp chứng gốc.
5 / 90 engine detections
Mở báo cáochecked — no detections recorded
Mở báo cáono community references
Mở báo cáoNo threat flag
Mở báo cáoNo malicious flag
Mở báo cáoResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, caixageral.digital, is flagged as a high-risk generic phishing infrastructure designed to impersonate Caixa Geral Depósitos (CGD), a major Portuguese financial institution. The page title explicitly displays 'Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD,' indicating an intent to deceive customers into submitting sensitive credentials, such as login details or personal identification numbers. Analysis of the domain reveals no direct association with known drainer kits, but the use of a legitimate-looking SSL certificate and financial branding suggests a targeted credential harvesting campaign. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain is registered through Name.com, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 35.157.26.135, hosted on Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) in Germany. The domain was created on June 17, 2026, an anomalous future date that may indicate registry manipulation or typosquatting. VirusTotal detection shows 2 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious, while it appears on a single security blocklist and is currently blocked by PhishDestroy. No entries were found in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis. The domain remains active, posing an ongoing risk to CGD customers and general internet users. The use of a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate (YE1) enhances the appearance of legitimacy, increasing the likelihood of successful deception. Response actions should include immediate blacklisting by network security providers, takedown requests to the hosting provider (Amazon Web Services), and registrar-level suspension. Users are advised to avoid interacting with the domain, verify financial institution URLs through official sources, and enable multi-factor authentication to mitigate credential theft risks. The anomalous creation date and low detection rate suggest the infrastructure may evade automated defenses, requiring manual review for accurate threat classification.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Danh tiếng của Edge-IP không được quy cho tên miền này.
dns1.p03.nsone.netdns2.p03.nsone.netdns3.p03.nsone.netdns4.p03.nsone.netLocation describes the IP network.
27e9402d0872c5e86ec72e57c7d184c1d4fa3288be1304ad51fd16930153624dSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='caixageral.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
caixageral.digital
5/90 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePD-20260618-B083FB
caixageral.digital
View sourcePage captured
View sourceĐược 1 thành viên cộng đồng báo cáo; ghi nhận lần đầu 18/06/2026
PD-20260618-B083FB Recipient: abuse@name.com Nếu bạn đã nhập thông tin xác thực tài khoản, thông tin cá nhân hoặc thông tin thanh toán hoặc đã tải xuống tệp từ miền này, hãy hành động ngay lập tức. Dưới đây là các nguồn lực giúp bạn báo cáo vụ việc và bảo vệ chính mình.
Chọn quốc gia của bạn để nhận liên hệ tội phạm mạng chính thức hoặc soạn thảo đơn khiếu nại →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
caixageral.digital)Dù bạn chưa nắm rõ tất cả các chi tiết — vẫn nên nộp báo cáo. Ngay cả những thông tin không đầy đủ cũng vẫn có ích cho công tác điều tra.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Phân tích mối đe dọa bằng cách sử dụng danh sách chặn được lưu trữ, WHOIS, DNS và bằng chứng quét công khai
Quét ngayHãy gửi các tên miền đáng ngờ đến cơ sở dữ liệu mối đe dọa của chúng tôi — để bảo vệ cộng đồng
Báo cáoCác báo cáo lừa đảo gần đây và những thay đổi về tính khả dụng được quan sát thấy
Theo dõiTheo dõi các mối đe dọa đang diễn ra hoặc phản đối danh sách này nếu bạn cho rằng đây là kết quả báo động sai
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.