VirusTotal
4 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“Zest Protocol | The Bitcoin liquidity protocol”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is support@eranet.com, support@tnet.hk, info@todaynic.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 16 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
підробка під Sei: zestprotocol.pro — Останній відомий активний (HTTP 200). Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 4/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
4 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звіт3 det.
Відкрити звіт4 community references
Відкрити звітScan report
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
zestprotocol.pro is an impersonation phishing page that copies Zest Protocol and presents itself under the title "Zest Protocol | The Bitcoin liquidity protocol". It targets people looking to lend, borrow or supply liquidity in Bitcoin DeFi who land on the lookalike domain instead of the genuine project. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-03. When last checked on 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
Fake DeFi front ends like this reproduce the real protocol's branding so the visitor trusts the page enough to act on it. The usual next step is a "connect wallet" or "claim" prompt that leads to a malicious signature or transaction request, or a form asking for a recovery phrase. Signing hands the attacker control over assets the wallet can move, and a typed seed phrase gives them the whole wallet. Either way, losses are typically immediate and cannot be reversed on-chain.
On 2026-10-15, VirusTotal showed 4 of 92 engines flagging the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That is a low count, so many browsers and security products may still let the page load without a warning. ScamSniffer, a Web3-focused scam feed, lists it alongside PhishDestroy. Four AlienVault OTX pulses also reference the domain, which shows other researchers are tracking it.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-23 through Eranet International Limited, just ten days before PhishDestroy detected it. That short gap fits a site set up specifically for this campaign. It sits behind Cloudflare (AS13335, US), which conceals the actual origin server. Its Let's Encrypt certificate gives it a browser padlock, but that only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about who runs the site.
If you connected a wallet to zestprotocol.pro, review and revoke any token approvals or permissions granted during that session using a trusted approval checker, and move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything you did not understand. If you entered a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and transfer assets to a new wallet created with a new phrase right away. Reach Zest Protocol only through links from its verified official channels, not through search ads or direct messages. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, add it to wallet and browser protection lists, and report it to Cloudflare and the registrar.
Last checked
Репутація Edge-IP не пов’язана з цим доменом.
jonah.ns.cloudflare.comlilith.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
ea0e7be89e8d404537985b96cce80b7b9edadae0a4442ac69e007eb201d3aa1eSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of zestprotocol.pro · checked Oct 5, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Доступний
No threat flag
View source4/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261003-6D0886
zestprotocol.pro
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
zestprotocol.pro
PD-20261003-6D0886 Recipient: support@eranet.com, support@tnet.hk, info@todaynic.com Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
zestprotocol.pro)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.