VirusTotal
9 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“Zerocas: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 5 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
шахрайське криптоказино: zerocas.com — Доступно · доступ обмежено (HTTP 403). Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 9/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
9 / 92 engine detections
Відкрити звітШкідливий
Відкрити звітScan report
Відкрити звіт4 community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
zerocas.com presented itself as "Zerocas: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain". PhishDestroy classifies it as a fraudulent gambling site aimed at people who want to bet with cryptocurrency. We first detected it on 2026-10-14. The site has been offline since 2026-10-17 after its provider blocked the content, and it was still down when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Fraudulent crypto casinos use the language of transparency, "blockchain-based" and "provably fair", to make players comfortable sending coins straight from their wallets. Deposits go to addresses the operators control. Balances and winnings exist only in the site's own interface. When a player tries to cash out, the usual pattern is stalled withdrawals or new demands for verification deposits, taxes or unlock fees, each one another payment that never comes back. Because crypto transfers are irreversible, the victim loses everything deposited and anything paid afterward to free up fake winnings.
On 2026-10-14, nine of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, including BitDefender, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Gridinsoft and Lionic. That is a modest count, but the vendors are independent of each other. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and matched the page to generic crypto and crypto-scam patterns. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tracked it as well.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-05-27, about 140 days before we detected it. That gap left the casino months to build a player base before it was flagged. It ran behind Cloudflare's network in the US, which hides the real origin server from visitors. It used a free automated Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about whether the operator was legitimate.
If you deposited crypto on zerocas.com, do not send any further "fee" or "verification" payment to release a balance, because those requests are part of the scam. Save your transaction hashes, deposit addresses and account screenshots, and report them to the exchange you sent funds from and to local police. Be wary of anyone offering to recover your funds for an upfront fee. If you reused your casino login password elsewhere, change it on those accounts. Security teams should block the domain and watch for similar casino-branded domains appearing on fresh registrations.
Репутація Edge-IP не пов’язана з цим доменом.
cleo.ns.cloudflare.commallory.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
31f19f6513452922838f79b84f86046ed5e02777dd652bf65aa38976d24a4e60Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.zerocas.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of zerocas.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
https://zerocas.com/Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8Server: cloudflareCF-Cache-Status: DYNAMICContent-Encoding: gzipc164e1ea36438d14fea9b88996d154275a4c92fd80bfa082c7e00a343f241147DYNAMICa4a923dcefc88af6-YYZkeep-alivegziptext/html; charset=UTF-8Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:55:10 GMT{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=znYYzsG%2FovWCo9gexOquaMDv2zlO6RnYs%2BiJQ76l9wo%2BI1uAlY8M087grtqlISvLYj6KfCu%2Fq87ZfuayX1BdWHzOFUiOT2dS8yUX78tlEzqfxIBtTNuoN12HKfjghw%3D%3D"}]cloudflarecfCacheStatus;desc="DYNAMIC"chunkedOriginValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
cloudflare_ban: raw=cf_phishing_block; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare; provider_error=cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
zerocas.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
Невідомо→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
Доступний→Недоступно
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Доступний
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source9/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261014-6CD3AF
zerocas.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20261014-6CD3AF Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
zerocas.com)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.