VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“GEP Protocol (Genome Evolution Protocol): What It Is”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@spaceship.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
фішинг: opengep.com — Останній відомий активний (HTTP 200). Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
6 / 91 engine detections
Відкрити звітchecked — no detections recorded
Відкрити звіт4 community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
opengep.com impersonates GEP Protocol, also called Genome Evolution Protocol. It targets crypto users who search for the project and land on what looks like an official or authoritative source. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-19. The site was still online with its content live on 2026-10-19. Its page title reads like a neutral explainer, "GEP Protocol (Genome Evolution Protocol): What It Is", while our classification is impersonation phishing.
Impersonation sites like this borrow a project's name and present themselves as the place to learn about it, claim it or take part in it. The "what it is" framing builds trust with people researching GEP Protocol. Once trust is established, the visitor is pushed toward an action such as connecting a wallet, signing a transaction or entering sensitive details. In crypto, that step usually hands the operator control of funds or tokens, and the losses are typically irreversible.
Wallet-security blocklists back the classification. MetaMask and the SEAL network list the domain alongside PhishDestroy, so MetaMask users may already see a warning. On VirusTotal, 6 of 91 engines flagged it as of 2026-09-27: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a modest share, so many browsers and security tools will still let the page load without any alert.
The domain was registered through Spaceship, Inc. on 2026-02-21, roughly seven months before PhishDestroy caught it. That gap suggests the domain was held in reserve or ran quietly before drawing attention. It sits behind Cloudflare, Inc., which masks the real origin server, and it currently resolves to an address geolocated in Canada. Its certificate comes from Google Trust Services, so the browser padlock only means the connection is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site.
If you connected a wallet or signed anything on opengep.com, revoke token approvals for unfamiliar contracts with a reputable approval checker. Move remaining assets to a fresh wallet if you shared a seed phrase or private key. If you entered passwords or other credentials, change them and enable two-factor authentication. Get GEP Protocol information only from channels the project itself verifies. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and check logs for past visits.
Last checked
Репутація Edge-IP не пов’язана з цим доменом.
charles.ns.cloudflare.comcourtney.ns.cloudflare.comroute3.mx.cloudflare.netpriority 68route2.mx.cloudflare.netpriority 68route1.mx.cloudflare.netpriority 84Location describes the IP network.
5ebbccaca1efaf63b696c7949c5f0a9980c300043967ffb66734d08591264eb5Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of opengep.com · checked Sep 19, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
opengep.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Невідомо→live_content
content_served
Доступний
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260919-228A35
Page captured
View sourceopengep.com
View sourcePD-20260919-228A35 Recipient: abuse@spaceship.com Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
opengep.com)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.