VirusTotal
3 / 91 engine detections
Відкрити звіт“Bot Verification”
домен у блоклистах: novanole.com — Контент недоступний. Зведення доказів: VirusTotal 3/91 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Netcraft, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score…
Докладний аналіз PhishDestroy AI нижче залишено англійською, щоб зберегти оригінальний криміналістичний запис.
3 / 91 engine detections
Відкрити звітScan report
Відкрити звіт4 community references
Відкрити звітprovider verdict: clean
Відкрити звітNo threat flag
Відкрити звітNo malicious flag
Відкрити звітResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
novanole.com is an impersonation phishing site. It posed as a legitimate service so visitors would trust it with their information. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-24, one day after the domain was registered. The site went offline on 2026-09-27, and when we checked again on 2026-10-19 its DNS was still inactive.
Impersonation pages copy the look and wording of a trusted brand, then ask the visitor to sign in, verify an account or confirm details. Anything typed in goes straight to the operators. Depending on what the page asks for, a victim can lose account credentials, personal data or, on crypto-themed fakes, access to a wallet. The page was titled "Bot Verification," which reads like a routine human check rather than a branded login, while our classification for the site is impersonation phishing.
VirusTotal results from 2026-09-26 show 3 of 91 engines flagging the domain: Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Netcraft and SOCRadar. That is a low count. Netcraft and Forcepoint, though, run dedicated phishing feeds, so their agreement with our verdict carries weight. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX pulses, which means other researchers tracked it independently. Of the blocklists we monitor, PhishDestroy is the only one listing it.
The operation moved fast. The domain was registered through OwnRegistrar, Inc. on 2026-09-23, was serving phishing content by the next day, and was gone four days after registration. Short lifespans like this are common for throwaway phishing domains that get rotated once they are detected. The server sat on the FranTech Solutions network in Luxembourg. It used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about whether the site could be trusted.
If you entered a username and password on novanole.com, change that password right away on the real service and on any other account that shares it. Then turn on app-based two-factor authentication and review recent logins for unfamiliar sessions. If you typed a wallet recovery phrase, consider that wallet compromised and move any remaining funds to a newly created wallet. Defenders should block the domain and search DNS and proxy logs from 2026-09-23 to 2026-09-27 for lookups of it. Any user found in those logs should get a password reset.
ns5.my-control-panel.comns6.my-control-panel.comnovanole.compriority 0Location describes the IP network.
ae19521ae5889215e243d83767b8e31362aa29e2b3a01e0caaafcd75411be5daSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of novanole.com · checked Sep 24, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Невідомо→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Доступний→Недоступно
6→3
5→6
4→5
3→4
2→3
1→2
Доступний
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source3/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260924-10E745
Page captured
View sourcenovanole.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
novanole.com
PD-20260924-10E745 Recipient: abuse@ownregistrar.com Якщо ви ввели облікові дані облікового запису, особисту чи платіжну інформацію або завантажили файл із цього домену, негайно вживіть заходів. Нижче наведено ресурси, які допоможуть вам повідомити про інцидент і захистити себе.
Виберіть свою країну, щоб отримати офіційні контакти кіберзлочинців або створити проект скарги →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
novanole.com)Навіть якщо ви не знаєте всіх подробиць — все одно подати заяву. Навіть неповна інформація все одно допомагає у розслідуванні.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Аналіз загроз за допомогою збереженого списку блокувань, WHOIS, DNS і загальнодоступних доказів сканування
Сканувати заразДодавайте підозрілі домени до нашої бази даних загроз — захищайте спільноту
ПовідомитиОстанні звіти про фішинг і помічені зміни доступності
ВідстежуватиСлідкуйте за актуальними загрозами або оскаржте цей запис, якщо вважаєте, що це помилкова тривога
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.