VirusTotal
5 / 95 engine detections
Raporu aç“fi-ca.digital is a custom short domain”
Engel listesindeki alan adı: fi-ca.digital — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 5/95 (alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
5 / 95 engine detections
Raporu aç1 community reference
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain fi-ca.digital was observed resolving to the IPv4 address 207.174.61.1, which belongs to the Amazon Web Services network (ASN16509) located in the United States. Registration records indicate the domain was created on 11 December 2025 through NameCheap, Inc., and the authoritative name servers are dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com. The site presented the page title “fi-ca.digital is a custom short domain” and did not serve an SSL/TLS certificate, indicating HTTP‑only delivery. Threat intelligence sources have flagged the domain: it appears on a single security blocklist, is listed in one AlienVault OTX pulse, and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment.
VirusTotal scanned the URL with 95 engines, of which five returned positive detections, further corroborating the phishing classification. The current operational status is offline, suggesting the hosting has been taken down or the site has been disabled. Analysis indicates that the infrastructure relies on a cloud provider (AWS) and a low‑cost registrar, a pattern commonly used to reduce attribution and increase turnover of malicious short‑link services. The lack of TLS, the generic page title, and the low trust score point to a purpose-built redirector rather than a legitimate service. No additional content has been captured, so the exact phishing payload, target brand, or credential‑stealing mechanism remains unknown.
Defenders should prioritize immediate blocking of the domain and its resolved IP address at network perimeters. Adding the domain to internal DNS blocklists and updating endpoint security signatures to reflect the five VirusTotal detections will reduce exposure. Continuous monitoring of the associated AWS CIDR ranges for new short‑link domains registered through NameCheap can help identify future replicas.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.registrar-servers.comdns2.registrar-servers.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fi-ca.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
fi-ca.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/f5c2011a-8b8a-49bf-88af-519a0a735d91
5/95 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcefi-ca.digital
View source1 topluluk üyesi tarafından bildirildi; ilk görülme 14.12.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fi-ca.digital)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.