VirusTotal
3 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“Banliva”
Engel listesindeki alan adı: banlivatrusts.online — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 3/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft)…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
3 / 91 engine detections
Raporu açSuspicious
Raporu aç52/100
Raporu açchecked — no detections recorded
Raporu açno community references
Raporu aç14 kontrol edildi — engelleme yok
No threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain banlivatrusts.online is a generic phishing site designed to deceive users into disclosing sensitive information such as login credentials or personal data. It does not impersonate a specific brand or employ a known crypto drainer kit. As of the latest verification, banlivatrusts.online has been taken offline, though it previously posed an elevated risk to visitors.
Technical analysis of banlivatrusts.online reveals limited detection by security vendors, with 2 of 95 VirusTotal vendors flagging the domain, including Fortinet and SOCRadar. The domain was registered through Global Domain Group LLC on February 22, 2026, and resolved to the IP address 94.130.140.179, hosted by Hetzner Online GmbH in Germany. It appears on 3 security blocklists, including PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. The SSL certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt (E7), and the observed page title was 'Banliva'. The site utilized technologies such as WordPress, MySQL, PHP, and LiteSpeed, with a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100.
Users who may have interacted with banlivatrusts.online should immediately change any exposed passwords and enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on affected accounts. Monitor financial and online accounts for unauthorized activity and report any suspected fraud to relevant platforms or authorities. To help prevent future incidents, report the domain to anti-phishing organizations such as the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) or local cybersecurity agencies.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns2.namecheaphosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
e8333fc70a6c79f6b8993c474c56538213d25c69becd5316df6dc772785076d9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of banlivatrusts.online · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
content_divergence · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='banlivatrusts.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
banlivatrusts.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Erişilebilir→Mevcut değil
3/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcebanlivatrusts.online
View sourcePD-20260222-ABF09B
Page captured
View source1 topluluk üyesi tarafından bildirildi; ilk görülme 22.02.2026
PD-20260222-ABF09B Recipient: abuse@hetzner.com Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
banlivatrusts.online)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.