VirusTotal
9 / 95 engine detections
Abrir relatório“Polymarket (Полимаркет) – официальный сайт и регистрация”
Phishing de frase-semente: polymarket.expert — Conteúdo indisponível. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 9/95 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
9 / 95 engine detections
Abrir relatóriono community references
Abrir relatórioprovider verdict: clean
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioPage capture
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis as of July 24 2026 flags polymarket.expert as an elevated‑risk Apple wallet/seed phishing infrastructure that has been taken offline. The domain was registered through NameCheap on 06 Nov 2025 and resolves to the IPv4 address 162.0.217.157, which belongs to AS22612 (Namecheap, Inc.) and is geolocated in the Netherlands. Four Zomro nameservers (ns1.zomro.net, ns2.zomro.ru, ns3.zomro.com, ns4.zomro.su) resolve the domain, indicating use of a third‑party DNS provider. No TLS certificate is presented, and the HTTP service returns an offline status.
VirusTotal records nine positive detections out of ninety‑five scanners, confirming malicious classification by multiple vendors. The domain appears on a single security blocklist and is specifically listed by PhishDestroy. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 / 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment. The only visible page element is the title “Polymarket (Полимаркет) – официальный сайт и регистрация,” which does not reference Apple but the branding inference is derived from the declared impersonation target.
The threat is categorized as wallet/seed phishing, suggesting attempts to harvest cryptocurrency wallet recovery phrases. Uncertainty remains regarding the exact payload delivered, as the site content has not been captured and no SSL/TLS handshake was observed. Defenders should block the domain and its hosting IP at perimeter and DNS layers, monitor for any future resolution to the same IP or nameserver set, and incorporate the domain indicator into threat‑intel feeds. Continuous re‑scanning of the IP and related domains is advised to detect potential re‑activation.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.zomro.netns2.zomro.runs3.zomro.comns4.zomro.suLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='polymarket.expert', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErr
polymarket.expert
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/e78898cf-2ae4-4114-b5e9-81830b749cbf
9/95 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourcepolymarket.expert
View sourceDenunciado por 1 membro da comunidade; visto pela primeira vez em 05/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
polymarket.expert)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.