VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
Abrir relatório“Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system”
Imitação de Wordpress: midnightnetwork.online — Último ativo conhecido (HTTP 200). Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 15/91 (ADMINUSLabs, ChainPatrol…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
15 / 91 engine detections
Abrir relatório24 community references
Abrir relatórioprovider verdict: clean
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioNo malicious flag
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain midnightnetwork.online was registered on 24 September 2025 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB and is delegated to the authoritative name servers ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com. DNS resolution points to the single IPv4 address 84.32.84.32, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited located in Lithuania. An HTTPS negotiation presents a certificate issued by Google Trust Services under the WR1 profile, indicating a valid TLS chain but offering no evidence of malicious signing. An HTTP GET returns status code 200 and the page title “Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system”, consistent with a parking page rather than a crafted phishing landing page.
The site employs Hostinger’s CDN, Google Analytics, and HTTP/3, all of which are typical of benign hosting services. VirusTotal analysis shows 12 of 95 scanners flagging the domain, and the Gridinsoft trust score is 0 / 100, reflecting a high‑risk assessment. The domain appears on a single external blocklist and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service. AlienVault OTX includes the domain in one threat‑intel pulse, and the overall classification is “Brand Impersonation” targeting the WordPress brand.
No additional payloads, redirects, or credential‑harvesting forms have been observed; the current offline status prevents further content collection. Given the combination of a low trust score, multiple vendor detections, and explicit branding of WordPress impersonation, security teams should treat midnightnetwork.online as a high‑confidence malicious indicator. Recommended mitigations include adding the domain and its resolved IP to DNS‑based deny lists, extending web‑proxy filtering rules to block any HTTP(S) request to the address, and monitoring for new Hostinger‑parking domains that reference the same brand target. Continued vigilance is advised, as the underlying hosting infrastructure can be reused for future impersonation campaigns.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
c301b61d38bfc7fa7bf39d4f03289c6ad9ce4a31c7997019eff846362434b5dewww.midnightnetwork.onlineSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.midnightnetwork.onlineDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of midnightnetwork.online · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=hcdn
midnightnetwork.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Acessível→Indisponível
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Indisponível→Acessível
Acessível→Indisponível
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→live_content
content_served
Desconhecido→inactive
expired_landing_page · lifecycle_notice_page
Desconhecido→inactive
expired_landing_page · lifecycle_notice_page
Desconhecido→inactive
expired_landing_page · lifecycle_notice_page
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source15/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcemidnightnetwork.online
View sourceDenunciado por 1 membro da comunidade; visto pela primeira vez em 14/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
midnightnetwork.online)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.