VirusTotal
2 / 95 engine detections
Abrir relatório“Pocket Universe”
Phishing de frase-semente: duplicate-disabled-671.invalid — Conteúdo indisponível. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 2/95 (G-Data, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
2 / 95 engine detections
Abrir relatóriono community references
Abrir relatórioprovider verdict: clean
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioPage capture
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis indicates that www.pocketuniverseshield.com poses a high-risk brand impersonation threat. The domain is associated with content designed to imitate a legitimate entity identified as across, potentially misleading visitors into believing they are interacting with an authentic service. Brand impersonation infrastructure is commonly used to facilitate credential collection, fraudulent transaction approval requests, account compromise attempts, or other forms of user deception. The observed page title, "Pocket Universe", may contribute to the appearance of legitimacy and increase the likelihood of user interaction. The domain remains active, creating an ongoing exposure risk for visitors.
Technical indicators support heightened scrutiny of this domain. Infrastructure analysis reveals that the domain resolves to IP address 64.29.17.65, located in the US within AS16509 Amazon.com, Inc. Registration records indicate the domain was created on August 20, 2024 and registered through NameCheap, Inc. Security telemetry shows that 2/95 security vendors currently flag the domain. The domain appears on 1 security blocklist and has been blocked by a security-monitoring organization. Additional observations indicate that no SSL certificate is present. The combination of active status, impersonation behavior, security detections, lack of certificate coverage, and blocklist inclusion increases the overall risk profile associated with the domain.
Users who accessed the domain should review any information submitted during the session and evaluate whether credentials, authentication data, wallet information, or other sensitive details may have been exposed. Any potentially affected passwords should be changed immediately using trusted channels, and account activity should be monitored for unauthorized access. Security teams should consider blocking the domain and associated IP address 64.29.17.65, preserving network and browser logs, and investigating any communications linked to the site. Given the active status, VirusTotal detection rate of 2/95, creation date of August 20, 2024, and presence on 1 security blocklist, continued monitoring and defensive controls are recommended.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
A reputação do Edge-IP não é atribuída a este domínio.
ns1.vercel-dns.comns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-671.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by New
duplicate-disabled-671.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source2/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-671.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-671.invalid)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.