VirusTotal
1 / 93 engine detections
Abrir relatório“Boba Network - Claim Airdrop”
Airdrop falso: cloud-dropx.online — Conteúdo indisponível. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 1/93 (Gridinsoft); 4 external blocklist matches; PhishDestroy…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
1 / 93 engine detections
Abrir relatóriono community references
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioNo malicious flag
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
On 23 July 2026, a technical assessment was performed on the domain cloud-dropx.online. The domain was registered on 23 May 2025 through Hostinger Operations UAB and resolves to the IPv4 address 45.67.136.10, which belongs to autonomous system AS213535 operated by YottaSrc in the Netherlands. The site presented an SSL certificate identified as R13, indicating the presence of a publicly trusted TLS layer. The page title returned by the server at the time of capture was “Boba Network – Claim Airdrop”, and the underlying kit has been classified as an “Airdrop Scam” kit, a known vector for crypto‑related phishing campaigns. The domain is explicitly marked as impersonating the Metamask brand, aligning with the declared crypto‑scam type.
Detection telemetry shows that one of ninety‑three security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain as malicious. The host is listed on five independent blocklists, including PhishDestroy, ScamSniffer, Polkadot, Enkrypt and Codeesura, reinforcing the consensus that the infrastructure is being used for illicit activity. Independent reputation services assigned a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 out of 100, the lowest possible rating, indicating a high confidence of malicious intent. The current operational status is “offline”, suggesting that the site has been taken down or is otherwise inaccessible. No live HTTP response or page content was available for further forensic analysis, so the exact phishing landing page structure and any credential‑harvesting mechanisms remain unknown.
However, the combination of a brand‑impersonation tag, a crypto‑airdrop lure, a low trust score, and multiple blocklist entries provides sufficient evidence for defensive actions. Defenders should immediately add cloud-dropx.online to network‑level deny lists, update URL filtering policies, and monitor DNS traffic for queries to the associated IP address and ASN.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cloud-dropx.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
cloud-dropx.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Desconhecido→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourcecloud-dropx.online
View source1/93 engine detections
View source79 domínios semelhantes armazenados
Denunciado por 1 membro da comunidade; visto pela primeira vez em 09/09/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
cloud-dropx.online)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.