VirusTotal
5 / 90 engine detections
Abrir relatório“Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD”
Domínio em listas de bloqueio: caixageral.digital — Conteúdo indisponível. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 5/90 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
5 / 90 engine detections
Abrir relatóriochecked — no detections recorded
Abrir relatóriono community references
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioNo malicious flag
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, caixageral.digital, is flagged as a high-risk generic phishing infrastructure designed to impersonate Caixa Geral Depósitos (CGD), a major Portuguese financial institution. The page title explicitly displays 'Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD,' indicating an intent to deceive customers into submitting sensitive credentials, such as login details or personal identification numbers. Analysis of the domain reveals no direct association with known drainer kits, but the use of a legitimate-looking SSL certificate and financial branding suggests a targeted credential harvesting campaign. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain is registered through Name.com, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 35.157.26.135, hosted on Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) in Germany. The domain was created on June 17, 2026, an anomalous future date that may indicate registry manipulation or typosquatting. VirusTotal detection shows 2 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious, while it appears on a single security blocklist and is currently blocked by PhishDestroy. No entries were found in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis. The domain remains active, posing an ongoing risk to CGD customers and general internet users. The use of a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate (YE1) enhances the appearance of legitimacy, increasing the likelihood of successful deception. Response actions should include immediate blacklisting by network security providers, takedown requests to the hosting provider (Amazon Web Services), and registrar-level suspension. Users are advised to avoid interacting with the domain, verify financial institution URLs through official sources, and enable multi-factor authentication to mitigate credential theft risks. The anomalous creation date and low detection rate suggest the infrastructure may evade automated defenses, requiring manual review for accurate threat classification.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
A reputação do Edge-IP não é atribuída a este domínio.
dns1.p03.nsone.netdns2.p03.nsone.netdns3.p03.nsone.netdns4.p03.nsone.netLocation describes the IP network.
27e9402d0872c5e86ec72e57c7d184c1d4fa3288be1304ad51fd16930153624dSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='caixageral.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
caixageral.digital
5/90 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePD-20260618-B083FB
caixageral.digital
View sourcePage captured
View sourceDenunciado por 1 membro da comunidade; visto pela primeira vez em 18/06/2026
PD-20260618-B083FB Recipient: abuse@name.com Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
caixageral.digital)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.