VirusTotal
11 / 92 engine detections
Abrir relatório“billiejeansclohq.shop”
Phishing: billiejeansclohq.shop — Último ativo conhecido (HTTP 301). Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 11/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
11 / 92 engine detections
Abrir relatórioMalicioso
Abrir relatório2 community references
Abrir relatórioprovider verdict: clean
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
billiejeansclohq.shop is a fake online store. Its name suggests a casual clothing or denim boutique, but the page title shows only the bare domain, with no real brand identity behind it. It targets bargain-hunting shoppers, often reached through social media ads. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still live and redirecting visitors.
Shops like this copy the look of a real fashion retailer, list popular items at steep discounts, and push urgency with countdown timers or limited-stock badges. At checkout the victim enters card details, billing address and contact information. The payment is taken, but the order either never ships or is replaced by a cheap item unrelated to what was ordered. The card data and personal details can also be reused for further fraud.
Eleven of 92 VirusTotal engines flag the domain, including alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET, Fortinet, G-Data and Gridinsoft. That is a meaningful spread of independent vendors for a site this young. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and specifically identified the page as a fake shop. The domain also appears in two AlienVault OTX threat pulses and is on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc. on 2026-07-02, roughly three and a half months before it was detected. That gap is consistent with storefronts set up in batches and activated later. It resolves to 62.233.61.69, on a network registered to Malakmadze Web LLC in Georgia, while the IP geolocates to the United States.
If you paid on this site, contact your card issuer or bank right away and dispute the charge as merchandise not received or fraud. Ask whether the card should be reissued. Keep screenshots, order confirmations and emails as evidence. Watch for phishing messages that reference your order, and change any password you reused when creating an account there. Security teams should block the domain and its IP at the web proxy and DNS level, and report the ads or posts that promoted it to the platform that served them.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
simone.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Desconhecido→redirected
http_redirect
Desconhecido→redirected
http_redirect
Desconhecido→redirected
http_redirect
Desconhecido→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source2 community references
View source11/92 engine detections
View sourcebilliejeansclohq.shop
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
billiejeansclohq.shop
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
billiejeansclohq.shop)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.