VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기“Zoom - Meeting Invitation”
zoomvideocall.online — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 브랜드 사칭: Zoom; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); URLQuery 2 alerts; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 90/100. 등록기관: Spaceship.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
6 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기2 threat-system alerts
보고서 열기no community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기80/100
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| YARAhub by abuse.ch | zoomvideocall.online/ |
malware | Detects file containing Telegram Bot API |
| Hagezi Threat Feed | zoomvideocall.online |
malicious | Sinkholed |
AI-assisted evidence review
Analysis indicates that the domain zoomvideocall.online was registered on July 20, 2026 through Spaceship, Inc. and began resolving to the IPv4 address 31.177.109.168 shortly thereafter. The domain is currently marked as active and is classified as a generic phishing threat with a high risk rating. It is listed on three public security blocklists and has been explicitly blocked by the PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL filtering services. DNS resolution is handled by the Cloudflare nameservers bethany.ns.cloudflare.com and langston.ns.cloudflare.com, suggesting the use of a reputable DNS provider to increase availability and mask the true hosting location.
A VirusTotal scan performed on the domain involved 95 independent scanning engines; none reported a detection at the time of analysis. While the absence of detections does not confirm benign behavior, it indicates that existing signatures have not yet identified malicious payloads associated with this host. No SSL certificate details, HTTP response codes, or page title information are available in the current intelligence set, leaving the surface‑web characteristics of the site unverified. Given the limited observable data, the primary indicators of compromise are the recent registration date, the association with known phishing blocklists, and the active blocking by multiple anti‑phishing platforms.
Defenders should continue to block zoomvideocall.online at network perimeter and endpoint layers, monitor DNS queries for the associated Cloudflare nameservers, and consider adding the domain to internal deny lists. Continuous re‑scanning with VirusTotal and other sandbox services is recommended to capture any future payload changes. Until additional evidence such as payload samples, SSL metadata, or HTTP behavior becomes available, the domain should be treated as a high‑confidence phishing infrastructure.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
bethany.ns.cloudflare.comlangston.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
06dfb2b375111c09374cffc903a2ae064119f948966e33901cbcdc871b0a2671www.zoomvideocall.onlineSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.zoomvideocall.onlineDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of zoomvideocall.online · checked Jul 22, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
접속 가능→이용 불가
6/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260722-F028F2
No threat flag
View sourcezoomvideocall.online
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
zoomvideocall.online
PD-20260722-F028F2 Recipient: abuse@smartape.ru 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
zoomvideocall.online)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.