VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기“uniswaplendwap.top”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abusecomplaints@markmonitor.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 24 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
uniswaplendwap.top — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 브랜드 사칭: Uniswap; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 11/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 2 det.; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: MarkMonitor.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
11 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기2 det.
보고서 열기2 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
uniswaplendwap.top is an impersonation phishing page that borrows the Uniswap name and targets DeFi traders and wallet holders. The domain fuses the brand with a made-up "lendwap" suffix, hinting at a lending or swap feature that Uniswap does not offer under this address. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-25. It was still online and serving content when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Pages like this copy a well-known DeFi brand so visitors trust the interface and press "Connect Wallet" without checking the address. The browser tab carries no branded title, only the bare domain name, so the address bar and page layout do most of the imitation. Once a wallet is connected, the victim is pushed to approve token allowances, sign permit messages or type in a recovery phrase. Any of these hands the operator control over the assets, which can then be moved out without further consent.
On 2026-10-03, 11 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. They include Kaspersky, BitDefender, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar, Lionic and the Vietnamese anti-scam group Chong Lua Dao. That is a minority of engines, but the flags come from several unrelated vendors. The domain is also listed on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists alongside PhishDestroy, so wallet users with those protections should see a warning. It appears in two AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-22, just three days before PhishDestroy caught it. That short gap is typical of throwaway phishing domains that go live soon after purchase. MarkMonitor, Inc. is the registrar. The site resolves to 3.33.139.32 on Amazon.com, Inc. infrastructure geolocated to Canada, which places it on mainstream cloud hosting rather than a niche provider.
If you connected a wallet to this site, use a token-approval checker right away to revoke any allowances you granted. Then move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything you did not understand. If you entered a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and transfer everything to a new one created with a new phrase. Reach Uniswap only by typing its official address or using a saved bookmark, not through links or search ads. Security teams should block the domain and its IP and add it to DNS and email filters.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a0d724-399e-7438-85fc-f3a8a07ca2dc/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/uniswaplendwap.top
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=uniswaplendwap.top
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.markmonitor.comns2.markmonitor.comns3.markmonitor.comns4.markmonitor.comns5.markmonitor.comns6.markmonitor.comns7.markmonitor.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=http_proxy
uniswaplendwap.top
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
protected→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
live_content→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
live_content→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source11/91 engine detections
View source2 community references
View sourcePD-20260925-5C3F2A
Page captured
View sourceuniswaplendwap.top
View source저장된 유사 도메인 79개
커뮤니티 신고 2건
범주PHISHING
Flagged by the PhishFort detection system as a domain threat under the class of: Phishing. Initial detection: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 01:39:21 GMT
PD-20260925-5C3F2A Recipient: abusecomplaints@markmonitor.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (US): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 15 U.S.C. § 45 - FTC Act (Deceptive Practices) Federal laws prohibit wire fraud, computer fraud, and deceptive business practices. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
uniswaplendwap.top)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.