VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기“Simple swap”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@registrar.eu.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Security analysis of simpleswap.capital covers observed phishing indicators, infrastructure evidence, current status, and defensive guidance.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
15 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기DBL_PHISH
Scan report
보고서 열기4 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기80/100
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
Analysis indicates that simpleswap.capital is a recently registered domain exhibiting multiple high-risk indicators consistent with phishing activity targeting cryptocurrency users. The domain was created on July 03, 2026, through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu and remains active as of July 25, 2026. Infrastructure analysis reveals it resolves to the IP address 91.92.241.159, which has previously been associated with suspicious hosting environments.
The domain is currently flagged by one security vendor, PhishDestroy, and is detected by 3 of 91 security vendors on VirusTotal, suggesting early but growing recognition of its malicious nature. Nameservers ns1.metaquotes.business and ns2.metaquotes.business further link the domain to infrastructure commonly used for financial scams, particularly those involving cryptocurrency or trading platforms. While the exact content of the site has not been fully analyzed, the domain name and detection patterns strongly suggest an attempt to impersonate a legitimate cryptocurrency exchange service.
Defenders should treat this domain as high-risk and prioritize blocking or monitoring access to it. Network security teams are advised to review logs for connections to 91.92.241.159 and the associated nameservers, as well as to implement real-time blocking based on available threat intelligence feeds. No SSL certificate details or HTTP response data are currently available to confirm the site's operational status or content, but the combination of registration recency, hosting infrastructure, and early detection by security vendors warrants immediate caution.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.metaquotes.businessns2.metaquotes.businessLocation describes the IP network.
19e0dc49a08933d3c09e6bf81b983274a23e8dad928b54a6a1716db45125702bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of simpleswap.capital · checked Jul 25, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
simpleswap.capital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
15/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260725-3A5437
No threat flag
View sourcesimpleswap.capital
View sourcePD-20260725-3A5437 Recipient: abuse@registrar.eu 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
simpleswap.capital)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.