VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“roit fidelity company – Online Payment Gateway & E-Wallet”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@velia.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
roitfidelitycompany.online — 확인되지 않음. 사기 유형: Banking Phishing. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 3/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy score 81/100. 등록기관: Spaceship.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
3 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기checked — no detections recorded
보고서 열기checked — no match recorded
24 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
This domain, roitfidelitycompany.online, is identified as a phishing site designed to impersonate a legitimate online payment gateway. Analysis of the page title, 'roit fidelity company – Online Payment Gateway,' indicates an attempt to deceive users into entering sensitive financial or login credentials under the guise of a trusted service. No specific drainer kit signatures were detected in initial scans, but the infrastructure aligns with generic credential-harvesting phishing campaigns targeting financial institutions or payment processors. The domain does not appear to mimic a single well-known brand but instead uses a fabricated name resembling established financial entities to lend false legitimacy. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain was registered on March 04, 2026, through Spaceship, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 148.72.153.160. VirusTotal reports 3 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious. The domain appears on one security blocklist and is assigned a trust score of 0/100 by Gridinsoft. The site employs HTTP/3, a protocol that may be leveraged to evade detection or improve performance, though its use here does not inherently indicate malicious intent. No detections were recorded in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis, suggesting either recent deployment or evasion techniques. The domain is currently offline, reducing immediate risk to end users. However, the infrastructure remains registered and could be reactivated or repurposed for future phishing campaigns. Users who may have interacted with the site are advised to monitor financial accounts for unauthorized transactions and reset credentials for any services where login details may have been entered. Organizations should update blocklists to include this domain and its associated IP address. The elevated risk level is retained due to the domain's recent creation, low detection rate, and potential for reuse in targeted attacks.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns3.afeeshost.comLocation describes the IP network.
277f6a29eb6affdaf05f1b9f09ce568a9063520b5b614174e50da3d3f04b25e5Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='roitfidelitycompany.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConn
roitfidelitycompany.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
2→3
2→3
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/e37b2db0-2dc9-41c8-ad60-3058c9639506
2→2
24 community references
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceroitfidelitycompany.online
View sourcePD-20260304-96C056
커뮤니티 구성원 1명이 신고 · 최초 확인 2026년 3월 4일
PD-20260304-96C056 Recipient: abuse@velia.net 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
roitfidelitycompany.online)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.