VirusTotal
8 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“PAR”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@spaceship.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 12 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
meteora.surf — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 308). 브랜드 사칭: MetaMask; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 8/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Spaceship.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
8 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기DBL_SPAM
Scan report
보고서 열기4 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
meteora.surf is a phishing domain built around the Meteora name and aimed at crypto users who trade or provide liquidity through that protocol. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-07, one day after the domain was registered. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and redirecting visitors elsewhere. Anyone arriving from a search ad, social post or direct message should treat it as hostile.
Impersonation sites of this kind copy the look of a familiar DeFi interface and push visitors to connect a wallet to claim rewards, manage positions or fix a supposed issue. The connection is followed by a request to sign a transaction or token approval that hands control of assets to the operator. Some variants ask for a seed phrase instead. Either way, the victim can lose the wallet's contents within minutes. The page title reads "PAR" rather than anything Meteora-related, while our classification is Meteora impersonation phishing.
Eight of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-11: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a modest count, but the vendors are independent of one another. Wallet-focused blocklists agree: MetaMask and SEAL both list it alongside PhishDestroy, so many wallet users will see a warning before they connect. Spamhaus carries it in its domain blocklist under the spam category, and four AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it.
The domain was registered through Spaceship, Inc. on 2026-10-06 and was already serving phishing content the next day. That short gap points to a throwaway domain set up for a quick campaign. It resolves to an IP address on Amazon.com, Inc. network space in the United States. The site has a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether it is legitimate.
If you connected a wallet to meteora.surf, use a token-approval checker to revoke any permissions you granted during the visit. Move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything you did not understand. If you typed your seed phrase into the site, consider that wallet fully compromised and transfer assets out immediately. Only reach Meteora through bookmarks you saved yourself. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, and add the hosting IP to watchlists for sibling domains.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a11563-87ac-70e3-847a-29a847724ac2/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/meteora.surf
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=meteora.surf
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20261009144839/https://www.meteora.surf/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
ns1.vercel-dns.comns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
819eb7f4e8894cfdbcbf5bf9f674d556f072d899cdef9717e0c98c2794c92dc9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.meteora.surfDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of meteora.surf · checked Oct 7, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
접속 가능
No threat flag
View source8/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261007-BD23F9
meteora.surf
View sourcePage captured
View source저장된 유사 도메인 79개
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
meteora.surf
PD-20261007-BD23F9 Recipient: abuse@spaceship.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (US): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 15 U.S.C. § 45 - FTC Act (Deceptive Practices) Federal laws prohibit wire fraud, computer fraud, and deceptive business practices. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
meteora.surf)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.