VirusTotal
4 detections · vendor total unavailable
보고서 열기“KPK | Scalable onchain asset management”
차단 목록 도메인: kpk.capital — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 4 detections (engine total unavailable) (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
4 detections · vendor total unavailable
보고서 열기2 threat-system alerts
보고서 열기2 community references
보고서 열기Scan report
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk crypto drainer phishing operation targeting onchain asset management users. Analysis indicates the site was designed to mimic legitimate decentralized finance platforms, likely to execute unauthorized transactions or drain cryptocurrency wallets upon interaction. The specific threat type—crypto drainer—is characterized by its focus on extracting digital assets through deceptive smart contract interactions or wallet connection prompts, a growing vector in financial fraud. Infrastructure analysis reveals multiple high-confidence indicators of compromise. The domain kpk.capital was registered on October 30, 2024, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a registrar frequently associated with short-lived phishing domains. It resolves to the IP address 188.114.96.3, which has been linked to other malicious infrastructure in recent threat intelligence reports. Security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain at a 4/95 detection rate, while it appears on three distinct security blocklists, including those maintained by browser extensions and enterprise security platforms. AlienVault OTX records the domain in two threat intelligence pulses, further corroborating its malicious classification. The page title, 'KPK | Scalable onchain asset management,' aligns with common phishing tactics that leverage cryptocurrency-related terminology to establish false credibility. Mitigation steps for this threat type require immediate action from both end users and security teams. Users who interacted with kpk.capital should revoke any connected wallet permissions via blockchain explorers or dedicated revocation tools, as crypto drainers often exploit lingering smart contract authorizations. Wallet addresses associated with the domain should be treated as compromised and added to internal blocklists. Organizations should update firewall rules to block the domain and its resolving IP (188.114.96.3) at the network perimeter. Given the domain's recent creation date and registrar history, security teams should monitor for newly registered domains under the same registrar or IP range, as threat actors frequently rotate infrastructure. For users, verifying domain authenticity through official project documentation or community channels remains critical to avoiding similar phishing schemes.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
anastasia.ns.cloudflare.comdamien.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='kpk.capital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SO
kpk.capital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
0→4
No threat flag
View source4 detections engine detections
View source2 community references
View sourcekpk.capital
View sourcePD-20260528-893DD5
커뮤니티 구성원 1명이 신고 · 최초 확인 2026년 5월 28일
PD-20260528-893DD5 Recipient: abuse@hostinger.com Registrar: Hostinger Operations UAB (Lithuania (EU)) Policy Violations: AUP prohibits illegal activity including fraud, phishing, malware hosting; Hostinger may suspend/terminate services and domains Applicable Laws: Lithuanian Criminal Code (Ch. XXX, §§196–198 data/system crimes; §§214–215 electronic fraud); EU Directive 2013/40/EU
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
kpk.capital)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.