VirusTotal
13 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“Login Redirect”
jito-airdrops.network — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 브랜드 사칭: Jito; 사기 유형: Airdrop Scam. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 13/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 2 alerts; Google Safe Browsing flagged; Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; 3 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: NameCheap.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
13 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기2 threat-system alerts
보고서 열기Threat flag recorded
보고서 열기DBL_PHISH
4 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
Stored evidence for jito-airdrops.network: VirusTotal recorded 6 detections among 91 scanners on 2026-09-01. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for jito-airdrops.network. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 6 detections among 91 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-01. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-01 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for jito-airdrops.network in the snapshot dated 2026-08-31. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains jito-airdrops.network as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed jito-airdrops.network on 2026-08-31. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-08-31 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-08-31. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-08-31 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
For jito-airdrops.network, the registrar field records NameCheap, Inc.; this is kept as an exact source value. The source stores 35.157.26.135 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for jito-airdrops.network is recorded as 2026-08-31. The SSL issuer is recorded as Let's Encrypt / YE2 in the snapshot dated 2026-08-31. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The jito-airdrops.network record states that VirusTotal recorded 6 detections among 91 scanners on 2026-09-01. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-08-31. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. For jito-airdrops.network, the registrar field records NameCheap, Inc.; this remains separate from the other source fields. The observed address field in this record contains 35.157.26.135. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for jito-airdrops.network. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to jito-airdrops.network during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain jito-airdrops.network as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to jito-airdrops.network. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 35.157.26.135 or to other infrastructure records.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
dns1.p09.nsone.netdns2.p09.nsone.netdns3.p09.nsone.netdns4.p09.nsone.netLocation describes the IP network.
22cb61f4b12767f7c5354edc629083a0051d1e945dc038c0b20c1bb93f0fe926Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of jito-airdrops.network · checked Aug 31, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
jito-airdrops.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
접속 가능→이용 불가
0→6
No flag recorded→Flag recorded
접속 가능
Threat flag recorded
View source13/89 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20260831-20779D
jito-airdrops.network
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260831-20779D Recipient: abuse@namecheap.com Registrar: Namecheap Inc (United States) Policy Violations: Domain Registration Agreement prohibits hacking, misuse of domain to conduct attacks, scam and fraudulent activities; AUP allows immediate suspension Applicable Laws: CFAA 18 U.S.C. §1030, Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. §1343, CAN-SPAM Act
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
jito-airdrops.network)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.