VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“Get rewarded for the internet you don't use”
grass.lat — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 브랜드 사칭: MetaMask; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 3/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, VIPRE); 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 73/100. 등록기관: Global Domain Group.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
3 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기no community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
grass.lat imitated Grass, the network that pays users for sharing spare internet bandwidth. It even reused the project's pitch as its page title: "Get rewarded for the internet you don't use." The likely targets were Grass participants and crypto users looking for rewards or token claims. PhishDestroy first flagged the domain on 2026-09-15. It went offline on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 its DNS no longer resolves.
Lookalike reward sites copy a real project's branding so visitors believe they are on an official claim or dashboard page. The usual next step is a prompt to connect a crypto wallet and sign a transaction or message presented as a reward claim. In reality, that signature can grant token approvals or transfer assets to the operator. Some variants also ask for account logins or recovery phrases, and anyone who supplies a seed phrase hands over full control of that wallet.
Three of 89 VirusTotal engines (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and VIPRE) flagged the domain on 2026-09-15. That count is low, which is typical for a page caught within days of going live. The stronger signal comes from crypto-focused blocklists: the domain is listed by MetaMask and SEAL alongside PhishDestroy. MetaMask's listing means its wallet users get a warning before they reach the page.
The domain was registered through Global Domain Group LLC on 2026-09-13, just two days before PhishDestroy detected it. It was dead within a day of detection. That short registration-to-takedown window points to a disposable site built for a quick campaign. Traffic ran through Cloudflare, Inc. on an address geolocated to Canada, which keeps the origin server out of view. The site used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about who was running it.
If you connected a wallet to grass.lat, use a token-approval checker to review and revoke any allowances you granted. Then move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything you did not understand. If you typed a recovery phrase, treat that wallet as fully compromised and empty it into a newly generated one immediately. If you entered a password, change it and enable two-factor authentication. Defenders should block grass.lat and watch for similar Grass-themed domains on cheap TLDs registered in quick succession.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
everton.ns.cloudflare.comjo.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
d5cdee84b14bcf79c64e4f371fe4655bd0cb6d38e1077d33b4a0bbbb2416011eSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of grass.lat · checked Sep 15, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
grass.lat
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
접속 가능→이용 불가
접속 가능
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourcegrass.lat
View source저장된 유사 도메인 79개
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
grass.lat)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.