VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기“My Blog – My WordPress Blog”
grandleagueinfo.online — 클로킹됨 · 접근 가능 (HTTP 302). 브랜드 사칭: Telegram; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 11/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; cloaking observed; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Spaceship.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
11 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기18/100
보고서 열기DBL_SPAM
16 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
grandleagueinfo.online is currently listed as an active generic phishing site with a high risk rating. The domain was registered on 14 May 2026 through Spaceship, Inc., and resolves to the IPv4 address 37.49.229.75, which is hosted in the Netherlands and associated with the ESTOXY OU network operator. HTTP requests return a 200 status code and the site presents a valid Let’s Encrypt certificate (R13). The visible page title “My Blog – My WordPress Blog” suggests the front‑end is a default WordPress installation, a common lure for credential‑stealing pages. The domain is served by the authoritative name servers ns1.globaldnsnetwork.com and ns2.globaldnsnetwork.com. Reputation metrics are poor: Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 18 / 100, and VirusTotal records four positive detections out of ninety‑five scanned security vendors. The domain is already blocked by the PhishDestroy list and appears on a single external blocklist, as well as being referenced in one AlienVault OTX pulse. While the infrastructure points to a deliberately hosted phishing portal, the specific target audience or brand impersonated remains unclear from the available data. No malicious payload hashes, command‑and‑control endpoints, or exploit kits have been observed in the current intelligence set. The low trust score and multiple vendor flags indicate malicious intent, yet the lack of publicly disclosed phishing content limits the ability to attribute the campaign to a particular threat actor or campaign. Defenders should treat grandleagueinfo.online as a high‑confidence phishing indicator. Immediate actions include adding the domain to network and email block lists, monitoring DNS queries for the associated name servers, and employing sink‑hole or sandbox analysis on any retrieved page content. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as the site may evolve to host additional payloads or expand its targeting scope.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/+6ppIpCWtkow2ZDM0Stored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-20 04:00:48 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns2.globaldnsnetwork.comLocation describes the IP network.
47876d2fef29ccf499996ae4f45b456ca735411c9b5368d1bcfad92ebeed804bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
status_split · redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://grandleagueinfo.online/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi; server=LiteSpeed
grandleagueinfo.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
접속 가능→이용 불가
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
접속 가능→이용 불가
No threat flag
View source16 community references
View source11/91 engine detections
View sourcegrandleagueinfo.online
View source커뮤니티 구성원 1명이 신고 · 최초 확인 2026년 5월 14일
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
grandleagueinfo.online)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.