VirusTotal
4 / 95 engine detections
보고서 열기“Home - Martech Fiancial Pay”
duplicate-disabled-292.invalid — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 브랜드 사칭: Google; 사기 유형: Brand Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 4/95 (alphaMountain.ai, Fortinet, G-Data, SOCRadar); URLQuery 100 det.; PhishDestroy score 95/100. 등록기관: PDR.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
4 / 95 engine detections
보고서 열기100 det.
no community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Page capture
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain was observed as www.martechfinancialpay.org and is currently offline. The site presented the page title “Home - Martech Fiancial Pay,” which does not directly reference the impersonated brand. PublicDomainRegistry’s PDR Ltd. is listed as the registrar, and the domain was created on 10 July 2025. DNS resolves to 192.3.190.186, an address owned by AS36352 HostPapa in the United States. The domain uses the authoritative nameservers dns1.webproserver.com and dns2.webproserver.com.
No TLS certificate was detected, meaning the site operated only over HTTP. VirusTotal scans show four of ninety‑five AV engines flagging the domain, indicating a modest detection rate. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of zero out of one hundred, and the domain appears on a single external blocklist, where it has been blocked by PhishDestroy. The campaign is classified as a brand‑impersonation attempt targeting Google, though the page title and visible content have not been publicly disclosed. The lack of an SSL certificate, low trust score, and presence on a blocklist suggest a high probability of malicious intent.
Because the site is offline, active verification of the payload is not possible, and the exact phishing kit or credential‑harvesting mechanism remains unknown. Defensive teams should continue to block the domain and its hosting IP at perimeter filters, add the IP range to reputation‑based deny lists, and monitor for any re‑registration or similar domains using the same registrar or nameserver pattern. Ongoing threat‑intel feeds should be consulted for any emergence of related indicators, and any future TLS certificates should be examined for potential misuse. Until the site is taken down permanently, the domain poses an elevated risk to users who might encounter it via email or malicious adverts.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.webproserver.comdns2.webproserver.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-292.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by New
duplicate-disabled-292.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-292.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-292.invalid)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.