VirusTotal
12 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“exchange”
duplicate-disabled-1082549.invalid — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 12/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 98/100. 등록기관: Gname.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
12 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기4 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
duplicate-disabled-1082549.invalid was an impersonation phishing page that presented itself simply as an "exchange". It targeted crypto users who believed they were signing up with or logging into a legitimate trading platform. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-10. The site has been offline since 2026-09-25 and was still dead when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Fake exchanges like this one mimic a real trading dashboard to win the visitor's trust. They then either harvest the account credentials typed into the login form or push the victim to deposit crypto into a balance that only exists on screen. The generic page title "exchange" fits a template built to pass as any platform. When a victim tries to withdraw, this kind of operation typically demands extra "fees" or "taxes" before releasing funds that were never really held. Victims can lose the deposits, those follow-up payments, and access to any real exchange account whose password was reused.
On 2026-09-18, VirusTotal showed 12 of 89 engines flagging the domain, among them BitDefender, Kaspersky, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai and the Vietnamese anti-scam group Chong Lua Dao. That is a modest count, but it comes from a broad mix of commercial and community sources. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and tagged the page as a cryptoscam. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers tracked it independently.
The domain was registered on 2017-05-10 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., more than nine years before it was caught serving this page. An aged name like this can slip past filters that distrust freshly registered domains. The site was hosted on VH Global Limited's network in Hong Kong at 103.24.217.234. It used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the browser padlock said nothing about whether the site was genuine.
If you deposited crypto here, do not pay any "withdrawal fee" or "verification charge" promising to unlock your balance, because that money goes to the same people. Report the transfers to your exchange and to local police, and keep the transaction IDs. Change the password on any real exchange or email account that shares credentials with what you typed, and turn on app-based 2FA. Be wary of "recovery services" that contact you afterward. Defenders should block the domain and its Hong Kong hosting IP and check logs for past visits from their users.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
b10.share-dns.netLocation describes the IP network.
2defa6dad8d32983ea49f94edc7a444583d1b3b2ec1ff1b2e21fc459eae13440Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-1082549.invalid · checked Sep 18, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
접속 가능→이용 불가
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source12/89 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceduplicate-disabled-1082549.invalid
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
duplicate-disabled-1082549.invalid
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-1082549.invalid)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.