VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기“Core Scientific”
coretific.online — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET); URLQuery 100 det.; URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Gname.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
14 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기100 det.
3/14
1/100
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기24 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기84/100
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
coretific.online is currently active and classified as a generic phishing site with a high risk rating. The domain was registered on June 17, 2025 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. and resolves to the IPv4 address 128.241.254.14, which belongs to AS213802 Tianfeng (Hong Kong) Communications Limited but is geolocated in the United States. HTTP requests return a 200 status code and the page title is reported as “Core Scientific”. The site presents a valid Let’s Encrypt certificate (R12) and advertises HSTS and HTTP/3 support, while its web stack includes Nginx and a Vue.js front‑end.
Reputation data shows a Gridinsoft trust score of 1 out of 100 and the domain appears on a single security blocklist; it is also listed as blocked by PhishDestroy. Threat intelligence indicates that the domain has been referenced in one AlienVault OTX pulse and 11 of 95 VirusTotal scanners have flagged it. The authoritative name servers are a.share-dns.com, a8.share-dns.com, b.share-dns.net and b8.share-dns.net. Analysis confirms that the domain is being used for phishing, but the specific credential‑capture mechanisms and targeted brands have not been disclosed in the available data.
The low trust score, detection by multiple vendors, and presence on blocklists suggest a high likelihood of malicious activity. Defenders should add 128.241.254.14 and the domain coretific.online to network and DNS block lists, enforce TLS inspection to capture potential credential submissions, and monitor for any outbound connections to the hosting AS. Continuous re‑scanning with VirusTotal and correlation with OTX feeds are recommended to capture any evolution in the payload or additional indicators of compromise.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.share-dns.coma8.share-dns.comb.share-dns.netb8.share-dns.netLocation describes the IP network.
d77508956ca14f62fe9fb8c35899cff695c60bf5f416d293e667927ef681058ccoretific.clubcoretific.comdeepcore-solutions.vipscientificbtc.comscientificbtc366.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of coretific.online · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=nginx
coretific.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
11→12
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source14/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcecoretific.online
View source커뮤니티 구성원 1명이 신고 · 최초 확인 2025년 12월 14일
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
coretific.online)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.