VirusTotal
6 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“anjar.shop”
anjar.shop — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 사기 유형: E Commerce Scam. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 6/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Netcraft); URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 83/100. 등록기관: Dynadot.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
6 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기1 community reference
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
anjar.shop is a fraudulent storefront that PhishDestroy classifies as an e-commerce scam. Its page title is simply the domain name, with no brand or store identity behind it, which is common for throwaway shops built to collect payments rather than fulfil orders. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-10-02. As of 2026-10-19 the site is still online and serving its shop content, so it can still take orders.
Fake shops like this list products at prices well below normal retail and push visitors toward a fast checkout. The buyer pays and receives either nothing, a cheap item unrelated to the order, or a stream of excuses about shipping delays. Victims lose the money they paid. Anyone who entered card details also faces the risk of further unauthorized charges, and their name, address and email can be reused in follow-up scams.
urlscan.io rated the site malicious and specifically flagged it as a fake shop, which matches our classification. On VirusTotal, 6 of 92 engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-13: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Netcraft and SOCRadar. That is a minority of engines, so many browsers and security tools may not warn visitors yet. The domain also appears in one AlienVault OTX threat pulse and on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc. on 2026-06-02, four months before PhishDestroy caught it. That gap gave the shop time to run and draw traffic before anyone flagged it. The site is hosted at 193.162.133.154 on the Malakmadze Web LLC network in the United States. It uses a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the browser padlock only means the connection is encrypted. It says nothing about whether the store is legitimate.
If you ordered from anjar.shop, contact your bank or card issuer right away to dispute the charge and request a chargeback, and ask about replacing the card. Watch your statements for unfamiliar transactions. If you created an account there, change that password anywhere else you reused it. Ignore any later emails or messages offering refunds or delivery updates, because these often lead to a second round of fraud. Security teams should block the domain and its hosting IP and add it to web filters and payment-fraud watchlists.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a00635-7511-718a-bb8d-ccdd34b8e6dc/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/anjar.shop
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=anjar.shop
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20240926162210/https://anjar.shop/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
jessica.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
81da3bf87c3b5900459f74e4b3b9ee33cec849fe6b4f4f37f290f65893d21edaSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy
anjar.shop
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source6/92 engine detections
View source1 community references
View sourceanjar.shop
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
anjar.shop)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.